|
The documentary "War on Ivermectin" explores the contentious landscape surrounding the drug Ivermectin during the COVID-19 pandemic. It delves into the controversy surrounding the use of Ivermectin as a potential treatment for COVID-19 and the challenges it has faced from regulatory bodies and mainstream medical establishments.
The documentary presents perspectives from advocates of Ivermectin, who argue for its efficacy and safety in treating COVID-19. It may shed light on the resistance faced by proponents of Ivermectin, exploring factors such as media portrayal, regulatory decisions, and the broader implications for the treatment landscape. Additionally, the documentary might feature interviews with medical professionals, researchers, and individuals who have been affected by the debate over Ivermectin. It aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the complex and polarized discussions surrounding the drug in the context of the global response to the pandemic.
0 Comments
Safe and Effective: A Second Opinion shines a light on Covid-19 vaccine injuries and bereavements, but also takes an encompassing look at the systemic failings that appear to have enabled them. We look at leading analysis of pharmaceutical trials, the role of the MHRA in regulating these products, the role of the SAGE behavioural scientists in influencing policy and the role of the media and Big Tech companies in supressing free and open debate on the subject.
Of those 34 eligible studies, 24 qualified for inclusion in the meta-analysis. They were separated into three groups: lockdown stringency index studies, shelter-in-placeorder (SIPO) studies, and specific NPI studies. An analysis of each of these three groups support the conclusion that lockdowns have had little to no effect on COVID-19 mortality. More specifically, stringency index studies find that lockdowns in Europe and the United States only reduced COVID-19 mortality by 0.2% on average. SIPOs were also ineffective, only reducing COVID-19 mortality by 2.9% on average. Specific NPI studies also find no broad-based evidence of noticeable effects on COVID-19 mortality. While this meta-analysis concludes that lockdowns have had little to no public health effects, they have imposed enormous economic and social costs where they have been adopted. In consequence, lockdown policies are ill-founded and should be rejected as a pandemic policy instrument. 
|
The Awareness domain contains research, news, information, observations, and ideas at the level of self in an effort to intellectualize health concepts.
The Lifestyle domain builds off intellectual concepts and offers practical applications.
Taking care of yourself is at the core of the other domains because the others depend on your health and wellness.
Archives
October 2024
Categories
All
|
||||
RSS Feed
