Feeding your dog a homemade raw diet can enhance their health and energy by providing whole, nutrient-dense ingredients tailored to their biological needs. Here's an adaptable recipe and practical guidance for a balanced raw diet based on principles of quality, variety, and species-appropriate nutrition.
​
Disclaimer: While raw feeding has many benefits, it’s crucial to work with a veterinarian or canine nutritionist to ensure a balanced diet tailored to your dog's needs.

1. Improved Digestion: Raw diets are easier for many dogs to digest, thanks to their natural enzymes and the absence of artificial fillers commonly found in kibble. These enzymes can reduce gastrointestinal upset and improve stool quality.
2. Enhanced Nutrient Absorption: Raw foods retain their full spectrum of nutrients, which can degrade during high-heat processing (as seen in kibble). This ensures dogs receive optimal amounts of vitamins, minerals, and enzymes.
3. Healthier Skin and Coat: The high omega-3 fatty acid content in raw diets (especially with fish or fish oil supplementation) promotes a glossy coat and reduces skin irritations.
4. Stronger Immune System: Antioxidants from raw vegetables and fruits help combat oxidative stress, while unprocessed proteins support robust immune functions.
5. Improved Dental Health: Chewing raw meaty bones naturally cleans teeth and strengthens gums, reducing plaque and tartar buildup.
6. Weight Management: A raw diet’s high protein and fat content, combined with low carbohydrates, supports lean muscle mass and a healthy weight.
7. Increased Energy Levels: Dogs fed a raw diet often exhibit higher energy and vitality, likely due to balanced blood sugar levels and superior nutrition.

The benefits of raw feeding stem from supporting the body’s innate ability to heal and maintain balance. By providing biologically appropriate food:

• Inflammation is Reduced: Processed diets with fillers, grains, and synthetic additives can trigger chronic inflammation.
• Gut Microbiome is Balanced: Raw diets promote beneficial gut bacteria, essential for immunity and nutrient absorption.
• Toxin Load is Minimized: Avoiding artificial preservatives and additives reduces the strain on detoxification organs like the liver.

While raw feeding has many benefits, safety and balance are crucial:

1. Food Safety: Use high-quality, human-grade ingredients to minimize the risk of pathogens. Practice safe handling and proper storage.
2. Balance Over Time: Ensure your dog’s diet includes appropriate proportions of muscle meat, bones, and organs, along with plant-based nutrients.
3. Veterinary Guidance: Consult a holistic or integrative veterinarian to tailor the diet to your dog’s specific needs, especially for puppies or dogs with health conditions.

1. Meat (60-75% of the diet): Muscle meat, organ meat, and raw edible bones form the bulk of a dog’s diet..

• Protein sources should be wild-caught or pasture-raised meeting true regenerative practice standards for the health of your pet and Earth.

​Ingredients (Daily Portion)​
1. Muscle Meat, Organ Meat, and Bone Meal (80% of meal):

• Example: Ground chicken, ground beef, ground turkey, raw eggs
• Amount: 12-16 ounces

2. Vegetables (10% of meal): Canned or homecooked pumpkin, lightly steamed carrots and broccoli.

• Amount: ½ cup or 1-1.5 ounces

3. Fruits (5% of meal): Finely chopped or pureed apple or blueberries.

• Amount: ⅛ cup.

4. Cod Liver Oil: For omega-3s and vitamin D.

• Amount: 500 mg.

5. Supplements (1-2x weekly):​​​

1. Rotate Proteins Regularly: To maintain a balanced diet and prevent nutrient deficiencies, vary the protein source weekly. Options include beef, lamb, turkey, venison, sardines, and eggs. Rotation also keeps meals more appealing to your dog.
   
2. Prioritize High-Quality Ingredients: Select meat that is pasture-raised, organic, or wild-caught whenever possible. This ensures optimal nutrition and minimizes exposure to harmful chemicals.
   
3. Store Properly for Freshness: Prepare large batches and freeze the food in small, airtight portions, like Pyrex containers, with minimal air exposure. This preserves nutrients and freshness. Ensure the food is frozen quickly and evenly.
   
4. Avoid Cooking Bones: Cooking bones makes them brittle, which can lead to splintering and pose a choking or internal injury hazard. For vegetables, light steaming enhances digestibility without significant nutrient loss.
   
5. Adjust Portions Based on Your Dog’s Needs: Monitor your dog’s weight and stool consistency to determine the correct portion size. Active dogs or growing puppies may require more food. Puppies, for example, often need up to twice the amount an adult dog would eat. An adult dog's daily portion can vary widely depending on the activity level, metabolism, and epigenetics. It can range between 2 and 5 cups of homemade food per day. It is normal for a puppy to have 4-6 bowel movements per day until six months old. 
   
6. Incorporate Supplements as Indicated: Add a pinch of Himalayan or sea salt weekly for flavor and minerals. Use probiotics, digestive enzymes, and a mushroom blend for additional health benefits. Cod liver oil provides essential omega-3 fatty acids.
   
7. Be Mindful with Fruits and Vegetables: Frozen produce is a convenient and nutrient-rich option. Limit raw cruciferous vegetables (e.g., broccoli, cabbage) unless steamed, as they can interfere with thyroid function when consumed in excess, particularly with an iodine deficiency.
   
8. Transition Gradually: Introduce raw food over 7-10 days to avoid digestive upset. Start with small portions mixed into the current diet, increasing the ratio daily.
   
9. Avoid Dangerous Foods: Never include cooked bones, onions, garlic, macadamia nuts, or chocolate. These can be toxic or harmful to dogs.
   
10. Observe and Adapt: Watch for signs of imbalance such as loose stools, lethargy, or coat changes. Adjust the diet or consult a veterinarian familiar with raw feeding if issues arise.

​
This holistic approach to raw feeding supports your dog's overall health, from improved digestion to shinier coats. For tailored advice, work with a veterinarian or animal nutritionist specializing in raw diets.

Why It’s Perfect for Raw Dog Food Preparation
Grinding a whole chicken—including bones and organs—can be daunting with less powerful equipment. The Weston Meat Grinder prevents jams, while its speed minimizes prep time. Bones are ground efficiently into fine, digestible meal suitable for dogs, ensuring you meet their nutritional needs with ease.
​
For pet owners who prioritize their pets' health, the Weston Meat Grinder delivers unmatched reliability, convenience, and durability.

Royal, Barbara, and Anastasia Royal. The Royal Treatment. Simon and Schuster, 25 June 2013.

Habib, Rodney, and Karen Shaw Becker. The Forever Dog. Harper Paperbacks, 12 Oct. 2021.

The debate surrounding the health benefits of organic versus conventionally grown foods has gained considerable attention. A recent systematic review sought to evaluate the existing data on this topic, with a particular focus on whether organic foods provide superior health benefits. The review analyzed 21 studies conducted between 2006 and 2022, specifically examining the impact of organic food consumption on various health outcomes.

Key Findings:
1. Cardiometabolic Health Benefits
The review revealed a significant inverse relationship between organic food consumption and cardiometabolic risk factors such as obesity, diabetes, hypertension, and high cholesterol. Many of the prospective studies found that individuals who consumed organic foods for at least six months had lower rates of these chronic conditions compared to those consuming conventional foods. These findings suggest that organic diets contribute to better heart health and metabolic function.
2. Reduced Pesticide Exposure
One of the most consistent findings across clinical trials was the lower pesticide exposure in participants consuming organic foods. Pesticide residues in conventionally grown foods pose measurable long-term health risks, and the reduction in exposure among those eating organic diets offer protective health benefits over time. While this connection is promising, the overall long-term effects remain to be thoroughly studied primarily due to study design complexities of epidemiological research.
3. Cancer Risk
​The review found significant relationships between the consumption of organic foods and protection against various types of cancer, including all lymphomas (including non-Hodgkin lymphoma), and postmenopausal breast cancer, compared to groups of people who consumed conventional (pesticide-laden) foods.

The widespread and excessive use of chemical fertilizers and pesticides, over time, has resulted in soil degradation, water pollution, and a reduction in biodiversity. These practices have also harmed agricultural workers, exposing them to harmful chemicals. Moreover, irrigation systems, though vital for boosting crop growth, have caused the buildup of chemical salts in the soil, leading to the abandonment of once fertile land.
​
The negative impact of these practices extends beyond the environment. Numerous studies have linked pesticide exposure to a range of serious health conditions, including cancer, metabolic disorders, birth defects, and neurodevelopmental disorders. In light of these risks, there has been a growing interest in organic agriculture, a farming method that seeks to produce food in a way that is healthier for both people and the environment.

Recent studies have explored the potential relationship between organic food consumption and cancer risk, revealing some intriguing findings.

Study 1: French Cohort
A French study led by Baudry et al. followed 68,946 adults for 7 years to assess their consumption of 16 certified organic foods. The results demonstrated a negative association between high organic food consumption and overall cancer risk - in other words, people who consume more organic foods are likely to have a lower overall risk of developing cancer. Those in the highest quartile of organic food intake (Q4) had a 25% lower risk of developing cancer compared to those in the lowest quartile (Q1), with a hazard ratio (HR) of 0.75. For every 5-point increase in biological score—reflecting greater diversity in organic food consumption—there was an 8% reduction in cancer risk.
Notably, certain types of cancer were more significantly impacted:

• Postmenopausal breast cancer: 34% lower risk (HR = 0.66).
• Non-Hodgkin lymphoma: 86% lower risk (HR = 0.14).
• All lymphomas: 76% lower risk (HR = 0.24).

While these findings suggest a potential protective effect of organic food, it is important to recognize the multifactorial nature of cancer, with genetics, lifestyle, and environmental factors all playing roles.

​Study 2: UK Prospective Cohort
Another study, conducted in the UK by Bradbury et al., followed 623,080 middle-aged women for an average of 9.3 years. This researchers observed found an association between women who consumed organic food had a 21% reduced risk of non-hodgkin lymphoma (RR = 0.79).

Recent studies have shed light on the relationship between organic food consumption and the risk of overweight and obesity. These studies suggest that those who consume a higher percentage of organic foods may experience slower weight gain and lower rates of obesity over time.

Study 1: Nutri-Net Sante
Kesse-Guyot et al. investigated the effect of organic food consumption on weight gain in a sample from the French “Nutri-Net Sante” cohort. Over a three-year follow-up, individuals who consumed more organic food had a significantly lower increase in Body Mass Index (BMI). Specifically, the highest consumers of organic foods (quartile 4) showed a 16% lower BMI increase compared to the lowest consumers (quartile 1). Additionally, those who ate more organic foods saw a substantial reduction in the risk of becoming overweight (23% reduction) and obese (31% reduction).

Cardiometabolic Health and Disease Risk
The link between organic food and cardiometabolic health was further supported by Baudry et al. in a larger sample of 54,283 adults. The study found that frequent organic food consumption correlated with a lower risk of cardiometabolic conditions, including hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Specifically, women with high organic food intake showed a reduced risk of T2DM, hypertension, and hypercholesterolemia by 49%, 43%, and 25%, respectively, with similar reductions observed in men. Regular organic consumers also had a significantly lower rate of cardiovascular diseases (CVD), with an odds ratio of 0.50, underscoring organic food as a potentially protective factor against CVD.

Maternal Health and Organic Food Consumption
Research on organic food consumption during pregnancy, including the “Koala Birth Control Study” and the “Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study” (MOBA), provides additional insights. High organic food intake among pregnant women was associated with a lower incidence of gestational diabetes mellitus and obesity, as well as a reduced risk of pre-eclampsia. In MOBA, organic vegetable consumption was linked to a 21% lower risk of pre-eclampsia, suggesting that specific organic foods may benefit maternal health outcomes.

Organic Foods and Metabolic Syndrome
Aljahdali et al. examined the relationship between organic food consumption and metabolic syndrome in older adults over four years. While initial results suggested a lower prevalence of metabolic syndrome among organic consumers, this association lost statistical significance after adjusting for confounding factors, suggesting that additional lifestyle and environmental factors may influence the impact of organic food on metabolic health.

Studies suggest that individuals who consume organic food frequently perceive various positive health effects associated with their dietary choices. A study by Van de Vijver and Van Vliet analyzed health perceptions among 566 organic food consumers, finding that 70% of participants reported a range of health benefits, including improved general health, greater resistance to illness, and heightened energy levels.

Perceived Health Benefits of Organic Diets
Participants in the study reported improvements across several areas of well-being:

• General Health and Energy: Many participants felt healthier overall, with enhanced vitality and resilience against illness, supporting the idea that organic diets may contribute to a greater sense of well-being and energy.
• Mental Health: About 30% of respondents noticed an improvement in mental health, which aligns with the idea that organic diets, typically high in nutrient-dense and unprocessed foods, may have a positive impact on mood and mental clarity.
• Gastrointestinal Function: Improved digestion and better gastrointestinal health were noted by 24% of the participants, suggesting that organic diets may support gut health, potentially due to reduced exposure to food additives and pesticides.
• Skin, Hair, and Nail Health: Approximately 19% observed benefits to their skin, hair, and nails, which could result from higher levels of certain vitamins, antioxidants, and phytonutrients in organic foods.

Implications of Self-Reported Health Perceptions
While these findings highlight a significant positive perception of organic food’s benefits, they are subjective. Self-reported data is inherently influenced by personal beliefs and lifestyle factors beyond diet. However, these insights underscore the broader appeal of organic food consumption and suggest areas for further research to objectively validate the specific health impacts of organic diets.
​
Overall, the study reveals that many organic food consumers attribute better physical, mental, and cosmetic health to their dietary habits, indicating that organic food’s benefits may extend beyond nutrition, affecting individuals' broader health perceptions.

Becca Levy’s “stereotype embodiment theory” expands on this idea, exploring how internalized beliefs about aging influence health outcomes. Her research revealed that older adults exposed to negative stereotypes about aging performed worse on memory tests and faced higher risks for health issues like cardiovascular disease. In contrast, positive stereotypes often supported better memory retention and healthier aging overall. In a 1994 study co-led by Levy and Langer, it was found that cultural groups with more positive views on aging, such as mainland Chinese individuals, tended to maintain better cognitive abilities than those with a more negative view of aging.

This collection of research, from Levy's stereotype embodiment theory to Langer’s time-travel experiment, suggests that our perceptions and expectations about health, aging, and vitality are, in fact, self-fulfilling. Just as those who consume organic foods often experience improved health partly due to their positive expectations, older adults who view aging positively may enjoy healthier, more active lives. This powerful interplay between diet, mindset, and self-fulfilling beliefs reinforces that health is deeply interconnected with our perceptions and attitudes.
​
For more in-depth insights, Levy’s research on stereotype embodiment offers a wealth of evidence on how a positive self-view can support healthier aging outcomes.

Nutritional Biomarkers and Organic Diets
In a subset of the "Nutri-Net Santé" study, Baudry et al. examined the nutrient profiles of high versus low organic food consumers. This group of 300 adults showed notable differences: those with diets high in organic foods had higher blood levels of beneficial nutrients like α-carotene, β-carotene, lutein, zeaxanthin, magnesium, and linoleic acid, while showing lower concentrations of iron and certain fatty acids (palmitoleic and γ-linolenic acids). Interestingly, no differences were observed for several other biomarkers, including α-tocopherol and retinol, suggesting that organic diets may elevate specific nutrient levels while having less impact on others.

Intake of Specific Nutrients from Organic Vegetables
A study by Hoefkens et al. analyzed data from Belgian and Flemish populations regarding nutrient intake from organic versus conventional vegetables. Findings indicated that organic vegetable consumers were more likely to meet recommended β-carotene levels and had higher intakes of lutein and calcium from organic lettuce, while the intake from organic spinach showed no difference compared to conventional. This highlights that specific organic foods may contribute differently to nutrient profiles based on their unique nutrient densities and how they are grown.

Biomarkers in Pregnant Women and Organic Food Consumption
In research by Simoes-Wust et al., pregnant women who consumed more organic foods had higher blood levels of certain natural trans fats and pentadecanoic acid (a marker for dairy intake) and lower levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (likely due to higher levels of vitamin K2). These results were attributed primarily to different dietary habits in organic consumers, rather than the organic quality of the foods alone.

Pesticide Exposure in Pregnant Women
Curl et al. investigated pesticide exposure among 20 pregnant women in their first trimester through a randomized controlled trial. After a 24-week dietary intervention, women who consumed organic food had lower urinary biomarkers for pyrethroid pesticides compared to those consuming conventional foods. This suggests that organic diets may specifically lower exposure to certain pesticide types, although the effect is not uniform across all pesticides.

Organophosphate Pesticide Levels in Adults
Oates et al. conducted a self-comparison study with 13 adults, revealing that a one-week organic diet reduced organophosphate pesticide levels by 89% compared to a conventional diet. The study measured dialkyl phosphate (DAP) metabolites, key indicators of organophosphate exposure, and found a significant decrease during the organic phase of the study, underscoring the effectiveness of an organic diet in lowering exposure to this pesticide class.

Variations in Pesticide Exposure Across Dietary Groups
Baudry et al. analyzed data from the NutriNet-Santé study, focusing on the dietary habits and pesticide exposure of various dietary groups. In a sample of over 33,000 adults—including omnivores, pesco-vegetarians, vegetarians, and vegans—those who ate primarily organic foods showed the lowest levels of pesticide exposure. Notably, vegetarians, who frequently consume organic produce, were found to be the least exposed to certain pesticides, potentially due to their limited consumption of conventionally grown foods.

Long-term Organophosphate Exposure and Organic Diets
In a study led by Curl et al., researchers estimated organophosphate pesticide exposure by assessing participants' dietary habits and food-specific pesticide levels. Participants who predominantly consumed organic foods had significantly lower concentrations of DAP metabolites in their urine compared to conventional consumers. The study, which involved 4,466 participants, highlights how sustained organic food consumption may reduce long-term pesticide exposure.

Mixed Pesticide Reduction in Pilot and Controlled Studies
Goen et al. and Rempelos et al. conducted controlled dietary studies that reinforced the pesticide-reducing effects of organic foods. In Goen’s 29-day study, two subjects demonstrated a notable decline in organophosphate, pyrethroid, and other pesticide metabolites when switching to an all-organic diet. Similarly, Rempelos et al.’s two-week controlled trial with 27 participants revealed a 91% reduction in average daily pesticide excretion in the organic group, though reductions varied by pesticide type. Both studies affirm that organic diets can substantially lower pesticide levels, albeit with variability depending on the specific compounds involved.

Potential Risks of Nitrate and Lead in Organic Produce
Hoefkens et al. compared pesticide intake from organic versus conventional vegetables in a Belgian and Flemish sample. Organic vegetable consumers were found to have higher nitrate levels from lettuce and greater lead intake from carrots, despite generally lower pesticide levels. This highlights an important caveat: while organic foods reduce pesticide exposure, they may still carry risks from other contaminants or naturally occurring compounds, necessitating balanced dietary choices.

3. Neurotoxic (Nervous System Damage)
Neurotoxic pesticides can damage the nervous system, leading to neurological disorders. Exposure to neurotoxic chemicals has been associated with an elevated risk of cognitive disorders, Parkinson’s disease, and developmental issues in children, including ADHD and autism. These pesticides can impair communication between nerve cells, affecting motor skills, memory, and mood, and potentially causing long-term nervous system damage.
4. Bioaccumulative (Persistent and Accumulative)
Bioaccumulative pesticides remain in the body over time, often accumulating in fatty tissues. This accumulation can lead to chronic exposure even after initial contact has stopped, raising the risk of toxic effects. These pesticides can be especially dangerous because they build up within food chains, leading to higher concentrations in humans and animals who consume contaminated food.
5. Hypertensive (Blood Pressure Increase)
Some pesticides have hypertensive effects, which means they can increase blood pressure. Chronic hypertension is a risk factor for cardiovascular diseases, including heart attacks and strokes. Long-term exposure to these chemicals can place additional strain on the cardiovascular system, potentially leading to severe health conditions.
6. Diabetogenic (Diabetes Risk)
Diabetogenic pesticides are linked to a higher risk of developing diabetes. These chemicals interfere with insulin regulation and glucose metabolism, potentially leading to insulin resistance and Type 2 diabetes. Prolonged exposure to these pesticides can exacerbate metabolic disturbances, making individuals more vulnerable to blood sugar regulation issues.
7. Inflammatory (Promoting Inflammation)
Certain pesticides trigger inflammatory responses within the body, which can lead to chronic inflammation. Chronic inflammation is a key factor in many diseases, including arthritis, cardiovascular disease, and cancer. Exposure to inflammatory pesticides may elevate the risk of these chronic diseases by sustaining prolonged inflammation in the body.
8. Immunotoxic (Immune System Damage)
Immunotoxic pesticides weaken the immune system, making the body more vulnerable to infections and reducing its ability to fight diseases. This immunosuppressive effect can lead to a higher susceptibility to infections, allergies, and potentially cancer due to weakened immune defenses.
9. Oxidant (Causing Oxidative Stress)
Oxidative stress results from an imbalance between free radicals and antioxidants in the body. Oxidative pesticides can increase free radical production, which damages cells, proteins, and DNA. Long-term oxidative stress is associated with aging, cancer, and neurodegenerative diseases like Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s disease.
10. Obesogenic (Weight Gain Promotion)
Obesogenic pesticides disrupt metabolic processes and have been linked to obesity. These chemicals may influence appetite, fat storage, and energy metabolism, increasing the likelihood of weight gain. Obesity itself is a risk factor for various health conditions, including diabetes, cardiovascular diseases, and certain cancers.

11. Teratogenic (Birth Defect Risk)
Teratogenic pesticides are known to increase the risk of birth defects by interfering with fetal development. Pregnant individuals exposed to these chemicals face an elevated risk of having children with birth defects, developmental delays, or other health issues. Teratogenic exposure can lead to severe consequences for unborn children and is a particular concern for pregnant farmworkers.
12. Hepatotoxic (Liver Damage)
Hepatotoxic pesticides damage the liver, an organ essential for detoxification and metabolism. Liver damage from pesticide exposure can impair its ability to filter toxins and regulate essential bodily functions. Long-term exposure may increase the risk of liver diseases, including fatty liver disease and cirrhosis.​

13. Genotoxic (DNA Damage)
Genotoxic pesticides cause mutations or damage to DNA, which can lead to cell dysfunction, cancer, and hereditary issues. These chemicals pose a significant health risk as they can lead to abnormal cell growth and potentially contribute to cancer development.
14. Microbiome Disruption
Organic foods support a healthier gut microbiome by reducing exposure to pesticides and synthetic chemicals that can disrupt microbial diversity. For example, glyphosate is known to impact beneficial gut bacteria negatively. Regenerative farming practices that avoid synthetic inputs contribute to a rich soil microbiome, enhancing the nutrient density of crops and supporting gut health indirectly by promoting healthier plants and animals​.

​Pesticide exposure remains a public health concern, especially for populations with frequent contact with these chemicals. Reducing exposure, particularly to these types of pesticides, may help lower risks and prevent long-term health impacts.

The Environmental Working Group's (EWG) "10 Americans" study is a powerful examination of chemical and pesticide exposure in humans, especially concerning the impact on children. Conducted in collaboration with Commonweal, the study focused on testing the blood and umbilical cord blood of 10 newborns in the United States. The results revealed traces of nearly 300 chemicals in these samples, including pesticides, flame retardants, industrial compounds, and other pollutants. These findings highlighted that exposure to harmful chemicals begins even before birth, a critical insight that has fueled concerns over long-term health impacts from early exposure.

Key Findings

1. Pervasive Presence of Chemicals
   The study found that each newborn tested positive for an average of 200 different chemicals, including substances known to be toxic. Many of these chemicals are classified as carcinogens, neurotoxins, or endocrine disruptors, raising concerns about potential health risks from cumulative exposure.
2. Early Exposure and Vulnerability
   The "10 Americans" study underscores how babies are exposed to a mix of chemicals from their mother's environment while still in the womb. The developing fetus is particularly vulnerable to the effects of these chemicals due to rapid cell division and organ formation. This exposure has been linked to a range of developmental and health issues, including neurological and immune system effects, which may manifest later in life.
3. Health Implications of Pesticide Exposure
   Among the chemicals detected, several were pesticides. Many pesticides are known to act as endocrine disruptors, affecting hormonal systems, and some are neurotoxic, which can impair brain development and cognitive functions. Studies have connected pesticide exposure to chronic health issues such as cancer, developmental disorders, and metabolic problems, especially when exposure occurs during critical growth periods.
4. Policy and Regulatory Implications
   The EWG's findings prompted calls for stricter regulations and greater oversight of chemicals used in agriculture, consumer products, and industrial applications. The study highlighted that current U.S. chemical safety regulations do not adequately account for prenatal and childhood exposure, often focusing only on adult exposure levels.
5. Increased Public Awareness
   The "10 Americans" study helped raise awareness about "body burden," or the accumulation of toxins in the body over time. This has led to more discussions about organic food consumption, reducing pesticide exposure, and advocating for environmental health policies that prioritize vulnerable populations, including pregnant women and children.

Antioxidant Capacity
Antioxidant capacity is another area where organic foods demonstrate a clear advantage. Using the Oxygen Radical Absorbance Capacity (ORAC) method, researchers determined that organic fruits, vegetables, red wine, and milk possess significantly higher antioxidant activity than their conventional counterparts (P<0.005). The benefits also extend to human health: a study involving a 14-day Mediterranean organic diet observed a 21% increase in total antioxidant capacity in participants’ plasma, reflecting how organic diets can potentially enhance the body’s defense against oxidative stress. Foods with greater antioxidant activity are more potent suppressors of the mutagenic action of toxic compounds, and inhibit the proliferation of cancer cells.

Nutritional Value of Organic Dairy
Organic dairy products, such as milk from organically managed cows, are richer in vitamins, antioxidants, and essential fatty acids. Additionally, organic milk fat contains higher levels of beneficial phospholipids—phosphatidylethanolamine, phosphatidylinositol, phosphatidylcholine, phosphatidylserine, and sphingomyelin—which support cellular health and cognitive function. These unique lipid profiles in organic dairy may also provide specific health advantages, particularly in areas like anti-inflammatory benefits and improved heart health and immune function.

​Specific Benefits in Certain Species
Organically grown oranges have notably higher levels of phenolics, anthocyanins, and ascorbic acid (vitamin C), which contribute to their increased total antioxidant activity. These phytochemical compounds not only enhance the flavor and nutritional profile but also serve as antioxidants that combat oxidative damage in the body. Similarly, Allium vegetables (e.g., garlic and leek) contain significantly more minerals (like calcium, magnesium, and zinc) and vitamin C (with an average increase of over 50% compared to conventional counterparts). ​Organic cultivation practices resulted in significantly higher levels of glucobrassicin and neoglucobrassicin in broccoli florets. 

​These results were simply limited to the availability of studies performed - In other words, researchers are likely to find similar results in other organically raised crops, the study results just haven't been included in this review.

1. Soil Health and Microbiome: Soil microbiome diversity is essential for healthy, nutrient-rich crops. However, practices vary widely:
   
   • Smaller Regenerative Farms: Often employ crop rotation, cover cropping, composting, and minimal tillage to support a thriving soil microbiome. These practices lead to more resilient, biodiverse soils capable of supporting a broader array of beneficial microorganisms.
   • Large-Scale Organic Farms: Many large farms use organic-approved inputs like neem oil or other sprays to control pests. Although these are technically organic, over-reliance on these inputs without further regenerative practices can lead to soil degradation and reduced microbiome diversity over time.
   
   
2. Biodiversity and Crop Rotation: Biodiversity is a hallmark of resilient, healthy ecosystems, and crop rotation is one of the simplest and most effective ways to enhance it:
   
   • Smaller Regenerative Farms: Often practice companion planting, crop rotation, and polyculture (growing multiple types of plants together) to support ecosystem diversity. These methods foster plant and insect biodiversity, which helps reduce pest pressures naturally.
   • Monocrop Organic Farms: Some large organic farms grow the same crops year after year without significant rotation, relying on natural pesticides to handle pest issues. Monocropping is less sustainable in the long term, as it exhausts soil nutrients and reduces natural pest resistance, which can affect soil health and crop nutrient density.
   
   
3. Pest Control Practices: Even within organic farming, there’s a range of pest control methods:
   
   • Mindful Pest Management: Smaller, regenerative farms often aim to work with the ecosystem, using companion planting, encouraging natural predators, and focusing on soil health to prevent pest issues naturally.
   • Organic Pesticides: Large organic farms might spray with neem oil or pyrethrin. While these are organic-approved, overuse or improper application can affect soil health and impact pollinators and beneficial insects.

The Importance of Knowing Your Farmer
Given the range of practices under the "organic" umbrella, it’s essential for consumers to understand where their food comes from. Get to know your local farmers, and ask about their practices:

• Crop Rotation and Soil Health: Do they prioritize soil-building practices like cover cropping and composting?
• Pest Management: Are they mindful of using minimal sprays, even if organic-approved? Do they take into account the health of neighboring farms?
• Biodiversity: Do they practice companion planting and polyculture, supporting a biodiverse farm environment?

Local farmers who employ regenerative techniques tend to produce higher-quality, nutrient-rich food. Buying directly from farmers or farmers' markets offers an opportunity to ask questions and choose farms that align with these high standards.

USDA Organic vs. Demeter Association Standards
Two primary organizations certify organic and biodynamic practices in the U.S.: USDA Organic and the Demeter Association. While both offer certification, Demeter has more rigorous standards, particularly regarding regenerative farming practices.

Demeter Association Certification (Biodynamic Farming)

• Standards: Demeter's certification is one of the strictest, requiring farms to be self-sustaining ecosystems. Inputs must come from within the farm whenever possible, and only a limited number of external organic inputs are allowed.
• Soil Health: Demeter-certified farms must maintain rigorous soil-building practices, including crop rotation, cover cropping, and specific compost preparations designed to enhance soil biodiversity.
• Biodiversity and Ecosystem Health: Biodiversity is a core requirement for Demeter. Farms are expected to be biodiverse ecosystems, using companion planting, integrating animals, and fostering wildlife habitats. Demeter certification requires that at least 10% of the total farm acreage is set aside for biodiversity preservation.
• Holistic Practices: Demeter-certified farms often go beyond organic practices, using lunar planting cycles and herbal compost treatments to enrich the soil.

While both USDA Organic and Demeter certifications offer assurances of organic farming, Demeter’s biodynamic standards reflect a deeper commitment to regenerative farming. This certification prioritizes soil health, biodiversity, and ecosystem balance more than USDA Organic, leading to healthier crops and more resilient farms.

Regenerative farming techniques improve soil biodiversity, nutrient cycling, and plant health, often resulting in higher-quality food. Healthy soil directly contributes to nutrient-rich crops and supports long-term sustainability. Supporting regenerative practices can help reduce the environmental burden of conventional agriculture while enhancing food quality and ecosystem resilience.
​
For consumers who value the highest level of integrity in organic farming, Demeter-certified products represent a top-tier choice. However, even within USDA Organic, there are small regenerative farms practicing beyond the standard requirements. By getting to know your local farmers and understanding their practices, you can make more informed decisions and support those who are dedicated to truly sustainable and regenerative agriculture.

The debate between organic and conventional food production often focuses on potential health and environmental benefits, as well as concerns over pesticide exposure and nutritional differences. Recent research supports the notion that organic agriculture offers several advantages, particularly when it comes to reducing exposure to harmful pesticides, promoting neurodevelopment, and potentially lowering the risk of certain diseases. The costs from pesticide use in regard to human health and associated costs to society are likely to be greatly underestimated due to hidden and external costs. 
​
One of the clearest benefits of organic food is reduced pesticide exposure. Consumers of organic produce have lower levels of dietary pesticides, which is significant because many pesticides are linked to health risks. Studies indicate that chronic exposure to pesticides, particularly organophosphate insecticides, can have neurotoxic effects on humans. Organophosphates, originally designed to target insect nervous systems, can also affect humans in similar ways due to the shared neurochemical processes among many species. For children, prenatal exposure to organophosphate insecticides is associated with developmental issues, including lower cognitive performance and increased risk of attention disorders, such as ADHD.

The CHAMACOS cohort study in California, for instance, showed that maternal exposure to organophosphates during pregnancy was linked to adverse cognitive outcomes in children, including attention deficits and reduced IQ scores. Similar studies from New York found that prenatal exposure to organophosphates, like chlorpyrifos, resulted in delayed mental and psychomotor development, structural brain changes, and even tremors in affected children. Collectively, these findings led to the classification of chlorpyrifos as a human developmental neurotoxicant.

Organic diets are linked to lower risks of certain health conditions, such as childhood allergies, obesity, and non-Hodgkin lymphoma. Though research on cancer risk is mixed, there is evidence suggesting that organic food consumers have a lower likelihood of developing non-Hodgkin lymphoma, likely due to reduced pesticide exposure. Furthermore, the high antioxidant content in organic foods, especially in fruits and vegetables, may contribute to a lower risk of chronic diseases by counteracting oxidative stress in the body.

Organic farm animals are less likely to develop certain diseases related to intensive production compared to animals on conventional farms. ar less attention has been paid to the potential effects of food processing. Organic dairy products and meats may also provide higher levels of omega-3 fatty acids, which are beneficial for cardiovascular health. Studies estimate that organic dairy and meat products have around 50% more omega-3 fatty acids compared to conventional options. Additionally, organic crops are likely to contain lower cadmium levels, as organic farming avoids the use of synthetic fertilizers, a common cadmium source in conventional agriculture. Lower cadmium intake reduces the body’s heavy metal burden, which can have long-term health benefits.

The environmental impact of organic agriculture is another significant factor. Organic farming practices tend to align with sustainable diets, which are associated with reduced land, energy, and water use, and lower greenhouse gas emissions. These practices resemble dietary patterns in the Mediterranean and New Nordic diets, which are known for their environmental and health benefits. Organic farming also generally avoids synthetic pesticides and fertilizers, which reduces pollution and promotes biodiversity.

Beyond health impacts, the societal costs of pesticide exposure are substantial. For instance, in the European Union, exposure to organophosphates is estimated to lead to the loss of 13 million IQ points annually, amounting to a potential economic impact of around €125 billion, or about 1% of the EU’s GDP. These calculations are based solely on one class of pesticides, suggesting that the full economic burden of pesticide-related health impacts is likely underestimated. By reducing exposure to these chemicals through organic and regenerative practices, societies could potentially save on healthcare costs and reduce chronic illness rates.

Example One
​The UK Food Standards Agency (FSA) has come under criticism for potential conflicts of interest in studies it has supported, including those evaluating the health benefits of organic versus conventional food. A report from the University of Sussex Business School highlighted that many members of FSA’s advisory and scientific committees have commercial ties to food and agriculture industries, raising concerns about potential bias in food policy recommendations. Studies supported by the FSA that found no significant health differences between organic and conventional food consumption are now under particular scrutiny, with some questioning whether industry ties could influence these findings.

The FSA’s advisory boards include members who disclose affiliations with large food and agriculture businesses, especially those involved in processed foods, an industry that might benefit from findings that downplay the benefits of organic food. In 2022, for example, over half of the FSA’s Science Council members declared conflicts of interest, raising questions about their ability to provide impartial recommendations. These associations have sparked calls for regulatory reforms to minimize commercial influence in food safety policymaking, including suggestions to prohibit industry-affiliated individuals from participating in these advisory bodies.

The FSA has policies for managing these conflicts, yet experts argue that the sheer presence of industry-aligned members on food safety committees may still affect impartiality, even if unintended. This situation has amplified advocacy for heightened transparency and reform in public health regulation to maintain unbiased, science-backed food safety standards that prioritize consumer health above commercial interests.

Example Two
The Science and Technology Options Assessment (STOA) Panel, as part of the European Parliament's research services, aims to provide impartial analysis on various scientific and technological issues. However, concerns have been raised about conflicts of interest, particularly regarding members with affiliations to the agricultural, food, and biotechnology industries. These ties are often viewed as potentially biasing the panel's recommendations, especially in areas involving genetically engineered organisms and biotechnology regulation.

For example, similar issues have emerged with the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), where industry-linked members, especially those connected with genetically modified (GM) food research, have faced scrutiny over their influence on regulatory guidelines. Testbiotech, an organization advocating for transparency, found that some of EFSA’s GMO panel members also worked with industry-backed groups that actively lobbied for deregulation of new genetic technologies​. 
​
To address similar concerns, research institutions have developed tools like the Food Research Risk (FoRK) toolkit. This toolkit is intended to guide researchers in evaluating the risk profiles of commercial food sector organizations when engaging in collaborative research, aiming to maintain transparency and public trust in food safety research​
BMJ
.
In light of these findings, some argue that STOA and similar panels might benefit from stricter conflict-of-interest guidelines to ensure balanced perspectives, especially given the potential for commercial ties to impact public trust in scientific advisories.


​Ultimately, when interpreting research on organic vs. conventional foods, it’s crucial to examine the study’s funding sources, look beyond the abstract, and consider the broader context of the findings. Research is a powerful tool for advancing knowledge, but understanding the financial and methodological factors influencing outcomes can help us make more informed choices about the food we consume.

Investigating the potential health risks of pesticide exposure from non-organic foods is challenging, partly due to difficulties in assessing long-term dietary patterns and exposure levels. Accurately measuring pesticide intake over years requires precise tracking, which is time-intensive and costly. Plus, the lack of reliable biomarkers for pesticide exposure means researchers rely on self-reported dietary data, which can introduce errors and inconsistencies in results.

Long-term studies would offer clearer insights into the potential health benefits of organic food, but they are rare due to their high costs and logistical demands. Researchers instead rely on prospective cohort studies, which track groups over time. While these studies are informative, they face issues such as maintaining participant compliance and accurately capturing dietary habits. Without biomarkers for organic food consumption, these studies often depend on self-reported data, which can vary in accuracy.

​While there is definitive evidence suggesting organic foods offer nutritional advantages, factors like the healthy user bias and limitations in data accuracy make it challenging to isolate the specific impact of organic foods on health. More robust, long-term research is always helpful to clarify how organic foods contribute to better health outcomes and to distinguish these effects from broader lifestyle habits.

Recent research indicates that consuming organic foods provides clear health benefits, lowering risks for non-communicable diseases such as cancer, type 2 diabetes (T2DM), obesity, and cardiovascular disease. Multiple studies suggest that organic food consumption is associated with lower risks of several chronic diseases. For instance:

• Cancer: Studies, such as those from the NutriNet-Santé Cohort and the Million Women Study, have linked organic food intake with reduced cancer risk, particularly for types like non-Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer. This may relate to the lower pesticide residue levels in organic produce, as long-term exposure to pesticides like organophosphates has been associated with increased cancer risk.
• T2DM and Obesity: Observational data indicate that organic food consumers tend to have lower rates of obesity and T2DM compared to those who follow conventional diets. This association may be partly due to dietary and lifestyle choices commonly seen among organic consumers, such as higher consumption of plant-based foods and reduced meat intake, which align with guidelines for managing weight and reducing diabetes risk.

While organic food consumption itself may reduce exposure to potentially harmful pesticides and heavy metals, it's important to consider the overall lifestyle of organic consumers. Data from studies such as the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) and the Norwegian Mother and Child Cohort Study (MoBa) show that people who consume organic foods are more likely to lead active, healthy lifestyles. These individuals often follow dietary patterns—such as the Mediterranean, DASH, and plant-based diets—that are linked to improved cardiometabolic health and cancer prevention, making it difficult to isolate the specific impact of organic foods.

One of the primary advantages of organic foods is the reduced presence of pesticide residues. Several studies, including randomized controlled trials and cross-sectional analyses, have consistently shown that organic diets lead to a significant reduction in urinary pesticide metabolites. This decrease is noteworthy as exposure to pesticides has been associated with a range of health issues, including neurodevelopmental disorders, hormonal imbalances, and increased risk of neurodegenerative diseases such as Alzheimer’s and Parkinson’s. However, while pesticide residues in conventional foods typically fall below regulatory limits, some research suggests that even low-level, long-term exposure may have cumulative or synergistic effects that are currently underestimated.

Organic foods tend to be more expensive due to factors such as lack of subsidies, limited supply, higher production costs, and more "complex" post-harvest handling requirements. Furthermore, organic farming yields are generally lower than those of conventional farming, raising questions about the scalability of organic agriculture to meet global food security needs. However, as demand grows, improvements in efficiency could reduce the cost and increase accessibility.

​The consumption of organic foods contributes to lower exposure to harmful pesticides and, a lower risk of various diseases. For optimal health benefits, choosing a diet rich in fruits, vegetables, whole grains, and plant-based foods, organically farmed whenever possible, remains essential. Further research is needed to better understand the unique health impacts of organic foods while exploring ways to make these benefits more widely accessible and affordable.

Energy drinks have become a popular beverage choice among various age groups, promising quick boosts in energy, alertness, and physical performance. However, scientific literature increasingly highlights a range of adverse health effects associated with their consumption. 

One of the primary ingredients in energy drinks is caffeine. Known for its ability to increase alertness and reduce fatigue, caffeine is a central nervous system stimulant that affects the body in several ways. One critical action of caffeine is its ability to block adenosine receptors. Adenosine is a neurotransmitter that typically promotes relaxation and sleep by dilating blood vessels. By blocking these receptors, caffeine prevents blood vessels from relaxing, which can lead to increased blood pressure.
​
Additionally, the blockage of adenosine receptors leads to an accumulation of adenosine in the blood. This rise in adenosine levels activates the sympathetic nervous system, which is responsible for the body's fight-or-flight response. Consequently, there is an increase in the production of stress hormones such as adrenaline and cortisol. These changes can lead to heightened anxiety, nervousness, and even palpitations.

Guarana is another common ingredient found in energy drinks. This plant, native to the Amazon basin, contains seeds that are exceptionally rich in caffeine, often surpassing the caffeine content found in coffee beans. The inclusion of guarana in energy drinks amplifies their overall stimulatory effects, making the beverages even more potent.
​
The high caffeine content in guarana adds to the risk of overconsumption of caffeine when individuals drink energy beverages, especially if they also consume other caffeinated products like coffee or tea throughout the day. This excessive intake can exacerbate the negative side effects of caffeine, including jitteriness, insomnia, and heart palpitations.

B vitamins are essential nutrients that play a crucial role in various bodily functions, including energy production and brain function. Energy drinks often contain high levels of B vitamins, such as B6 and B12, to promote energy and metabolic function. While B vitamins are vital for health, their effects can become problematic when consumed in large quantities alongside caffeine.
​
In large doses, B vitamins can support the stimulatory effects of caffeine and guarana, potentially leading to overstimulation. This can result in adverse effects such as increased heart rate, anxiety, and restlessness. Moreover, some people may experience side effects like gastrointestinal disturbances or allergic reactions due to high doses of B vitamins.

Taurine is a common additive in energy drinks, contributing to their stimulating effects. It can interact with caffeine to induce intracellular calcium release. This process can disrupt the normal calcium balance within cells, particularly in the heart and muscles. According to a study published in Reviews in Cardiovascular Medicine, "short term exposure to taurine increases intracellular levels of calcium in vascular smooth muscle cells and the heart, leading to a positive inotropic effect."
​
Positive inotropic agents, including caffeine, increase the amount of calcium available in heart cells, enhancing the heart's ability to contract more forcefully. While this can be beneficial in certain medical situations, excessive stimulation from such agents poses potential risks. Despite these concerns, taurine itself has numerous health benefits when consumed appropriately.

Taurine, a unique amino acid, plays several critical roles in the body. Unlike many other amino acids, taurine is not used to build proteins. Instead, it supports nerve growth, produces bile salts, aids in digestion, and helps maintain proper hydration.

​Taurine is classified as a "conditionally essential" or semi-essential amino acid. This means that while the body can naturally produce taurine, supplementation might be necessary under certain conditions. For example, infants and individuals with specific medical conditions might need additional taurine.

​Taurine acts as an antioxidant and anti-inflammatory agent, which may help combat sarcopenia, an age-related condition characterized by the loss of muscle mass and function. Taurine is also the most abundant source of sulfur in the body and is required for a wide range of physiological processes, including immune function, nervous system health, metabolism, and digestion.

Recent research, published in the June 2023 issue of the journal Science, highlights taurine's role in promoting longevity and healthy aging. This underscores the importance of obtaining taurine from natural sources rather than relying on synthetic forms found in energy drinks.

Taurine is abundant in animal foods such as seafood, red meat, poultry, and dairy products. Vegans, however, may need to consider high-quality taurine supplements since they do not consume these foods. While the body can synthesize some taurine, the amount produced may not be sufficient, especially as one ages and the body's ability to synthesize taurine diminishes.

Taurine is a vital nutrient with numerous health benefits, particularly when consumed through whole foods or high-quality supplements. While energy drinks often contain taurine, they are not a safe or reliable source of this or other essential nutrients. For those looking to boost their taurine intake, focusing on natural dietary sources or appropriate supplementation is key to reaping its health benefits without the risks associated with energy drinks.

Energy drinks have come under intense scrutiny after research linked their consumption to sudden cardiac arrest. The blend of stimulating ingredients in energy drinks could significantly jeopardize heart health, especially in individuals with specific genetic heart conditions. Researchers from the Mayo Clinic have suggested that energy drinks might be "arrhythmogenic foods," which could heighten the risk of sudden cardiac arrest.
​
Sudden cardiac arrest happens when there is an abrupt failure in the heart's electrical system, causing it to stop beating. This can result in arrhythmia, or an irregular heartbeat, such as ventricular fibrillation—the leading cause of cardiac arrest. Ventricular fibrillation is characterized by a heartbeat so rapid that the heart quivers instead of pumping blood effectively.

Researchers suggested that the highly stimulating and unregulated ingredients in these beverages might alter heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac contractility, and cardiac repolarization, potentially leading to arrhythmias.

Energy drinks usually contain a high amount of caffeine—ranging from 80 milligrams (mg) to 300 mg in a 16-ounce serving—along with other stimulant ingredients. Caffeine itself has been associated with sudden cardiac death in previous studies. Recently, Panera Bread removed caffeinated lemonade from its menu after lawsuits alleged the product caused two deaths from cardiac arrest.

While the relative risk of sudden death after consuming an energy drink is small, the absolute risk for patients with a known genetic heart condition is concerning. For these individuals, the risks and benefits of consuming energy drinks should be carefully considered. The researchers concluded that there should be an early warning about the potential risks of these drinks for people with genetic heart diseases.

If your energy is lagging and you're struggling with brain fog, energy drinks are not the answer. While they may provide a temporary boost, they come with significant health risks. Instead, optimizing your mitochondrial function is one of the most effective and sustainable strategies to increase your cellular energy. ​

​From a integrated perspective, the focus is on holistic and sustainable approaches to boost energy rather than quick fixes like energy drinks. Here are some better alternatives that can provide a midday energy boost:

Beverages
1. Herbal Teas 

• Examples: Green tea, ginseng tea, peppermint tea, or yerba mate.
• Benefits:  These teas can enhance mental alertness and physical energy. Yerba mate, in particular, contains caffeine, theobromine, and other compounds that promote energy. Green tea contains a moderate amount of caffeine and L-theanine, an amino acid that promotes relaxation without drowsiness. Matcha is a type of green tea that contains higher levels of antioxidants, caffeine, and L-theanine.
• Why: Provides a more balanced energy boost and improved mental focus without the crash often associated with energy drinks.

​​2. Magnesium

• Benefits: Essential for energy production and reducing muscle fatigue.
• Why: Many people are deficient in magnesium, which can lead to tiredness and lack of energy.

2. Complex Carbohydrates

• Examples: Oatmeal, whole grains, or a small piece of fruit.
• Benefits: Provides a steady release of energy.
• Why: Complex carbs are digested slowly, providing a more sustained energy source.

Lifestyle Approaches
1. Short Walk or Light Exercise

• Benefits: Boosts circulation and energy levels.
• Why: Physical activity can help shake off midday sluggishness and improve alertness.

2. Power Nap

• Benefits: Restores energy and improves cognitive function.
• Why: A 10-20 minute nap can be revitalizing without leaving you groggy.

3. Breathing Exercises

• Examples: Deep breathing or pranayama.
• Benefits: Increases oxygen intake and reduces stress.
• Why: Improved oxygenation can boost energy and mental clarity.

Shah SA, Szeto AH, Farewell R, et al. Impact of High Volume Energy Drink Consumption on Electrocardiographic and Blood Pressure Parameters: A Randomized Trial. Journal of the American Heart Association. 2016;5(9). doi:10.1161/JAHA.115.002134.

Coppock RW, Dziwenka MM, Stowe CM. Hepatitis due to excessive ingestion of energy drinks. BMJ Case Reports. 2016;2016. doi:10.1136/bcr-2015-212522.

Higgins JP, Tuttle TD, Higgins CL. Energy beverages: content and safety. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2010;85(11):1033-1041. doi:10.4065/mcp.2010.0381.
​
Malik VS, Popkin BM, Bray GA, et al. Sugar-sweetened beverages, obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus, and cardiovascular disease risk. Circulation. 2010;121(11):1356-1364. doi:10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.876185.

Costa-Valle MT, Tonieto BD, Altknecht L, Cunha CD, Fão N, Cestonaro LV, Göethel G, Garcia SC, Leal MB, Dallegrave E, Arbo MD. Energy drink and alcohol combination leads to kidney and liver alterations in rats. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2018 Sep 15;355:138-146. doi: 10.1016/j.taap.2018.06.024. Epub 2018 Jun 27. PMID: 29959998.

Hussain A, Jiji AK, Barke P, Biswas S, Tabrez SSM. Cardiovascular Pathologies Associated with Excessive Energy Drink Consumption: A Review. Crit Rev Eukaryot Gene Expr. 2018;28(2):107-113. doi: 10.1615/CritRevEukaryotGeneExpr.2018021703. PMID: 30055536.

Clapp O, Morgan MZ, Fairchild RM. The top five selling UK energy drinks: implications for dental and general health. Br Dent J. 2019 Apr;226(7):493-497. doi: 10.1038/s41415-019-0114-0. PMID: 30980003.

Al-Shaar L, Vercammen K, Lu C, Richardson S, Tamez M, Mattei J. Health Effects and Public Health Concerns of Energy Drink Consumption in the United States: A Mini-Review. Front Public Health. 2017 Aug 31;5:225. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2017.00225. PMID: 28913331; PMCID: PMC5583516.

​Kim H, Park J, Lee S, Lee SA, Park EC. Association between energy drink consumption, depression and suicide ideation in Korean adolescents. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2020 Jun;66(4):335-343. doi: 10.1177/0020764020907946. Epub 2020 Feb 29. PMID: 32114878.

Utter J, Denny S, Teevale T, Sheridan J. Energy drink consumption among New Zealand adolescents: Associations with mental health, health risk behaviours and body size. J Paediatr Child Health. 2018 Mar;54(3):279-283. doi: 10.1111/jpc.13708. Epub 2017 Sep 14. PMID: 28905482.

​Faris MAE, Jahrami H, Al-Hilali MM, Chehyber NJ, Ali SO, Shahda SD, Obaid RS. Energy drink consumption is associated with reduced sleep quality among college students: a cross-sectional study. Nutr Diet. 2017 Jul;74(3):268-274. doi: 10.1111/1747-0080.12289. Epub 2016 Jun 9. PMID: 28731611.

Park S, Lee Y, Lee JH. Association between energy drink intake, sleep, stress, and suicidality in Korean adolescents: energy drink use in isolation or in combination with junk food consumption. Nutr J. 2016 Oct 13;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12937-016-0204-7. PMID: 27737671; PMCID: PMC5064784.

Basrai M, Schweinlin A, Menzel J, Mielke H, Weikert C, Dusemund B, Putze K, Watzl B, Lampen A, Bischoff SC. Energy Drinks Induce Acute Cardiovascular and Metabolic Changes Pointing to Potential Risks for Young Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Nutr. 2019 Mar 1;149(3):441-450. doi: 10.1093/jn/nxy303. PMID: 30805607.

Toblin RL, Adrian AL, Hoge CW, Adler AB. Energy Drink Use in U.S. Service Members After Deployment: Associations With Mental Health Problems, Aggression, and Fatigue. Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e364-e370. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy205. PMID: 30169675.

Higbee MR, Chilton JM, El-Saidi M, Duke G, Haas BK. Nurses Consuming Energy Drinks Report Poorer Sleep and Higher Stress. West J Nurs Res. 2020 Jan;42(1):24-31. doi: 10.1177/0193945919840991. Epub 2019 Apr 8. PMID: 30957708.

Al Yacoub R, Luczkiewicz D, Kerr C. Acute kidney injury and hepatitis associated with energy drink consumption: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2020 Jan 29;14(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s13256-019-2340-0. PMID: 31992329; PMCID: PMC6988357.

Gupta N, Padidam S, Tewari A. Acute macular neuroretinopathy (AMN) related to energy drink consumption. BMJ Case Rep. 2019 Dec 15;12(12):e232144. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2019-232144. PMID: 31843776; PMCID: PMC6936580.

Garg A, Rodriguez A, Lewis JT, Bansal R, Brahmbhatt B. Energy Drinks: A Reversible Risk Factor for Atrophic Gastritis and Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia. Cureus. 2020 Dec 26;12(12):e12298. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12298. PMID: 33520500; PMCID: PMC7834582.

Haroun H, Mohamed E, El Shahat AER, Labib H, Atef M. Adverse effects of energy drink on rat pancreas and the therapeutic role of each of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and Nigella Sativa oil. Folia Morphol (Warsz). 2020;79(2):272-279. doi: 10.5603/FM.a2019.0069. Epub 2019 Jul 1. PMID: 31257565.

Shah SA, Chu BW, Lacey CS, Riddock IC, Lee M, Dargush AE. Impact of Acute Energy Drink Consumption on Blood Pressure Parameters: A Meta-analysis. Ann Pharmacother. 2016 Oct;50(10):808-15. doi: 10.1177/1060028016656433. Epub 2016 Jun 23. PMID: 27340146.

Nowak D, Gośliński M, Nowatkowska K. The Effect of Acute Consumption of Energy Drinks on Blood Pressure, Heart Rate and Blood Glucose in the Group of Young Adults. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Mar 19;15(3):544. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15030544. PMID: 29562659; PMCID: PMC5877089.

​Lasheras I, Seral P, Alonso-Ventura V, Santabárbara J. The impact of acute energy drink consumption on electrical heart disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Electrocardiol. 2021 Mar-Apr;65:128-135. doi: 10.1016/j.jelectrocard.2021.01.020. Epub 2021 Feb 9. PMID: 33631440.

Mansy, Wael, et al. “Effects of Chronic Consumption of Energy Drinks on Liver and Kidney of Experimental Rats.” Tropical Journal of Pharmaceutical Research, vol. 16, no. 12, 12 Jan. 2018, p. 2849, https://doi.org/10.4314/tjpr.v16i12.8.

​Graneri, L., Lam, V., D'Alonzo, Z., Nesbit, M., Mamo, J. C., & Takechi, R. (2021). The consumption of energy drinks induces blood-brain barrier dysfunction in wild-type mice. Frontiers in nutrition, 8, 668514.

​Valle, M. C., Couto-Pereira, N. S., Lampert, C., Arcego, D. M., Toniazzo, A. P., Limberger, R. P., ... & Leal, M. B. (2018). Energy drinks and their component modulate attention, memory, and antioxidant defences in rats. European journal of nutrition, 57, 2501-2511.

In TH2-mediated allergies, the immune system overreacts to innocuous substances, such as pollen, pet dander, or certain foods. While pollen, dust mites, pet dander, and certain foods are common allergens that can induce allergic reactions in susceptible individuals, exposure to environmental toxins and pollutants can also contribute to allergic sensitization and exacerbation of symptoms.

Environmental toxins such as air pollutants, industrial chemicals, pesticides, heavy metals, and volatile organic compounds (VOCs) have been associated with an increased risk of allergies and asthma. These substances can irritate the respiratory tract, disrupt the immune system, and promote inflammation, making individuals more susceptible to allergic responses.

For example, air pollutants like ozone, nitrogen dioxide, sulfur dioxide, and particulate matter have been linked to respiratory allergies and asthma exacerbations. Exposure to indoor pollutants such as mold, tobacco smoke, volatile organic compounds (VOCs) from household products, and formaldehyde from building materials can also trigger allergic reactions and worsen symptoms in allergic individuals.​

Furthermore, certain environmental toxins have been shown to disrupt the normal functioning of the immune system, leading to dysregulation of immune responses and increased susceptibility to allergies. For instance, exposure to endocrine-disrupting chemicals (EDCs) like bisphenol A (BPA) and phthalates during critical periods of development has been implicated in the development of allergic diseases later in life.

This exaggerated response involves the activation of TH2 cells and the release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), and interleukin-13 (IL-13).

Upon exposure to an allergen, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) process and present the allergen to TH2 cells, initiating an immune cascade. TH2 cells then stimulate B cells to produce allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies, which bind to mast cells and basophils, priming them for future encounters with the allergen.
​
Subsequent exposure to the allergen triggers the cross-linking of IgE antibodies on mast cells and basophils, leading to the release of inflammatory mediators, such as histamine, leukotrienes, and cytokines. This cascade of events culminates in the classic symptoms of allergies, including itching, sneezing, nasal congestion, and inflammation.

1. Initiation: When an individual comes into contact with an allergen, such as pollen, dust mites, certain foods, or a sea of environmental toxins, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) process and present the allergen to TH2 cells.
2. TH2 Activation: The allergen presentation stimulates TH2 cells to become activated and produce specific cytokines, such as interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-5 (IL-5), and interleukin-13 (IL-13).
3. B Cell Stimulation: The activated TH2 cells stimulate B cells to produce allergen-specific immunoglobulin E (IgE) antibodies.
4. IgE Binding: These IgE antibodies bind to mast cells and basophils, priming them for subsequent encounters with the allergen.

​Upon re-exposure to the allergen, cross-linking of IgE antibodies on mast cells and basophils triggers the release of inflammatory mediators, such as histamine, leukotrienes, and cytokines. This cascade of events leads to the classic symptoms of allergy, including itching, sneezing, nasal congestion, and inflammation.

The TH1 response is involved in combating intracellular pathogens, such as viruses and certain bacteria. It is characterized by the activation of T-helper 1 (TH1) cells and the production of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma) and other cytokines that promote cellular immunity.

In a healthy immune system, there is a delicate balance between TH1 and TH2 responses. Imbalances, such as excessive TH2 activity or insufficient TH1 activity, can lead to immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to infections, autoimmune diseases, or allergies.

Regulatory T cells (Tregs) play a critical role in maintaining immune balance by suppressing excessive immune responses, including both TH1 and TH2 responses. Dysfunction of Tregs can contribute to immune-related disorders.

In addition to TH1 and TH2 responses, the immune system employs various other mechanisms to combat pathogens and maintain homeostasis, including innate immunity, antibody-mediated immunity, and cell-mediated immunity.
​​
Understanding the interplay between different immune responses, including the TH2 allergic response and the TH1 response, is crucial for comprehending immune-related disorders and developing targeted therapeutic interventions. Balancing immune function and modulating specific immune pathways can help mitigate allergic reactions and restore immune equilibrium.

TH2 allergies are a common debilitation of quality of life for many individuals. While conventional over-the-counter pharmaceutical drugs are often used to manage symptoms, they frequently mask the underlying issue without addressing the root cause and can come with undesirable side effects. For example, Benadryl has been observed to result in birth defects and infant mortality.

Common Pharmaceutical Drugs for Allergies:

• Antihistamines (e.g., loratadine, cetirizine, diphenhydramine)
• Decongestants (e.g., pseudoephedrine, phenylephrine)
• Corticosteroids (e.g., fluticasone, prednisone)
• Mast cell stabilizers (e.g., cromolyn sodium)
  
• Leukotriene modifiers (e.g., montelukast) 

​​Common Unintended Side Effects:

• Drowsiness or fatigue
• Dry mouth or dry eyes
• Headache
• Nausea or gastrointestinal discomfort
• Dizziness or lightheadedness
• Increased heart rate or palpitations
• Nasal irritation or burning
• Increased risk of infections
• Mood changes or behavioral disturbances
• Elevated liver enzymes

For those seeking alternatives to pharmaceutical drugs, a stack of naturally occurring compounds designed to supplant their use has emerged. This stack includes:

​1. Whole Food Vitamin C: Known for its antioxidant properties and immune system support, whole food vitamin C can help regulate the immune response and reduce inflammation associated with allergies.

2. N-Acetyl Cysteine (NAC): NAC is a precursor to glutathione, a powerful antioxidant that helps combat oxidative stress and regulate the immune system. It has been shown to reduce inflammation and improve respiratory function in individuals with allergies.

3. Guduchi (Tinospora Cordifolia): A traditional Ayurvedic herb, guduchi has been used for centuries to support immune function and reduce allergic reactions. It possesses anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, making it beneficial for managing allergies.

4. Bromelain: Derived from pineapple, bromelain is a mixture of enzymes known for its anti-inflammatory and mucolytic properties. It can help alleviate nasal congestion and respiratory symptoms associated with allergies.

In contrast to conventional approaches that often focus solely on symptom management with pharmaceutical drugs, holistic modalities rooted in functional medicine address the underlying imbalances contributing to allergic responses. Here's how:

1. Identifying Triggers: Functional medicine practitioners conduct comprehensive assessments to identify allergens and other triggers, including dietary, environmental, and lifestyle factors.
2. Addressing Gut Health: The gut plays a crucial role in immune function and tolerance. Functional medicine emphasizes optimizing gut health through dietary modifications, probiotics, and gut-healing protocols to restore microbial balance and reduce inflammation.
3. Balancing Immune Function: Immune dysregulation underlies allergic responses. Functional medicine interventions, such as nutritional supplements, botanicals, and lifestyle modifications, aim to modulate immune function and promote tolerance to allergens.
4. Reducing Inflammation: Chronic inflammation exacerbates allergic symptoms. Functional medicine approaches focus on mitigating inflammation through anti-inflammatory dietetics, stress reduction techniques, and targeted supplementation with nutrients like omega-3 fatty acids and vitamin C.
5. Supporting Detoxification: In addition to supplementation, a functional medicine detox can be beneficial in mitigating body burden and supporting overall health. By addressing underlying imbalances and reducing toxic exposure, a detox program can help alleviate allergy symptoms and improve overall well-being. Environmental toxins can exacerbate allergic responses by burdening the body's detoxification pathways. Functional medicine advocates for detoxification protocols tailored to individual needs, including dietary modifications, sauna therapy, and targeted supplementation.

Kim, Hyon-Jeen, et al. “Nrf2 Activation by Sulforaphane Restores the Age-Related Decrease of TH1 Immunity: Role of Dendritic Cells.” Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, vol. 121, no. 5, 1 May 2008, pp. 1255-1261.e7, www.jacionline.org/article/S0091-6749(08)00148-6/fulltext, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaci.2008.01.016

Engwerda, C. R., et al. “Bromelain Modulates T Cell and B Cell Immune Responses in Vitro and in Vivo.” Cellular Immunology, vol. 210, no. 1, 25 May 2001, pp. 66–75, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/11485354/, https://doi.org/10.1006/cimm.2001.1807.

Singh, S. M., Singh, N., & Singh, V. (2009). Immunomodulatory and anti-tumor actions of Tinospora cordifolia (Guduchi). Natural Products: Chemistry, Biochemistry and Pharmacology, 114, 35-43.

​Belwal, T., Devkota, H. P., Hassan, H. A., Ahluwalia, S., Ramadan, M. F., Mocan, A., & Atanasov, A. G. (2018). Phytopharmacology of Acerola (Malpighia spp.) and its potential as functional food. Trends in food science & technology, 74, 99-106.

​Gilboa, Suzanne M., et al. “Use of Antihistamine Medications during Early Pregnancy and Isolated Major Malformations.” Birth Defects Research Part A: Clinical and Molecular Teratology, vol. 85, no. 2, Feb. 2009, pp. 137–150, https://doi.org/10.1002/bdra.20513. Accessed 10 Dec. 2019.

Given the aforementioned information, we find ourselves facing a choice to move forward. Below is a list of pathways to optimal nutrition in order of priority:

1. Consuming a diverse range of nutrient-dense foods directly from nature. (Ideal, but not practical choice)
2. Embracing whole foods along with high-quality supplements from whole food sources. (Practical choice)
3. Considering consuming multivitamins sourced from whole food sources. (Suboptimal, but adequate choice)

​If you are an expecting mother searching for the perfect multivitamin prenatal, consider FullWell – a comprehensive solution delivering optimal, evidence-based forms and doses of essential nutrients in one potent yet easily digestible formula.

FullWell stands out by offering fertility micronutrients, such as folate, B12, and chelated minerals, in active, bioavailable forms. These forms ensure that your body can efficiently absorb and utilize these crucial nutrients, promoting a healthy pregnancy. Unlike some other prenatals that may skimp on vital components, FullWell includes essential pregnancy nutrients like choline and magnesium, recognizing their importance for both maternal and fetal well-being.

Moreover, FullWell goes the extra mile by being free of common allergens. Gluten, wheat, dairy, peanuts, tree nuts, shellfish, eggs, sesame, corn, and soy are all excluded from the formula. This allergen-free profile ensures that you can enjoy the benefits of FullWell without worrying about potential sensitivities, allowing for a comfortable and worry-free pregnancy journey.
​
Choosing FullWell means choosing a prenatal multivitamin that prioritizes both the quantity and quality of nutrients, supporting you on your path to a healthy and vibrant pregnancy.

Remember, your journey into motherhood is unique, and prioritizing your health through optimal nutrition sets the stage for a thriving pregnancy.

In the realm of emerging wellness technologies, red and near-infrared light therapy stands out as a beacon of potential health benefits. This non-invasive treatment, also known as photobiomodulation, has gained attention for its positive effects on various aspects of health, particularly in skin and muscle recovery. Let's delve into the illuminating world of red and near-infrared light therapy and explore how it can enhance your well-being.

The Sun emits energy in various forms, each associated with specific ranges of the electromagnetic spectrum. Here's a breakdown of the forms of energy emitted by the Sun:

1. Visible Light: This is the portion of solar radiation that is visible to the human eye, creating the spectrum of colors we perceive.                  

• Percentage: Approximately 42%
• Wavelength Range: 380 to 750 nanometers

2. Infrared (IR) Radiation: Infrared radiation is not visible to the human eye but is felt as heat. It can be categorized into near, mid, and far infrared based on its wavelength.

• Percentage: Approximately 49%
• Wavelength Range: Greater than 750 nanometers
• Further Breakdown:
  • Near-Infrared (NIR): 0.75 to 1.5 micrometers
  • Mid-Infrared (MIR): 1.5 to 4 micrometers
  • Far-Infrared (FIR): 4 to 1000 micrometers (1 millimeter)

3. Ultraviolet (UV) Radiation: UV radiation is beyond the violet end of the visible spectrum. UVA and UVB reach the Earth's surface, playing a role in processes like vitamin D synthesis and causing sunburn.

• Percentage: Approximately 9%
• Wavelength Range:
  • UVA: 320 to 400 nanometers
  • UVB: 280 to 320 nanometers
  • UVC: 100 to 280 nanometers (mostly absorbed by Earth's atmosphere)

Each form of energy serves different functions and has distinct interactions with the Earth's atmosphere and surface. While visible light is the most familiar, infrared and ultraviolet radiation also play crucial roles in various natural processes. Most of the energy emitted from the sun in in the form of infrared light, so using infrared technology is approximating exposure to the sun, without the harm of UV light.

The human skin consists of several layers, each with distinct properties and functions. Understanding how red and NIR light navigate through these layers provides insight into their therapeutic reach.

1. Epidermis: The outermost layer of the skin is the epidermis, primarily composed of dead skin cells. Red light is adept at penetrating this layer, influencing various surface-level processes such as collagen production and inflammation.
2. Dermis: Deeper within lies the dermis, home to blood vessels, hair follicles, and connective tissues. Both red and NIR light penetrate the dermal layer, impacting blood flow, promoting wound healing, and influencing cellular activities that contribute to skin health.
3. Subcutaneous Tissue: The subcutaneous layer, rich in fat cells and larger blood vessels, poses a greater challenge for light penetration. While red light can reach this layer to a certain extent, NIR light excels in penetrating deeper, influencing cellular and metabolic processes within the subcutaneous tissues.

NIR light can affect the structure of water molecules through a process known as photodissociation or photolysis. This process involves breaking molecular bonds using light energy. While NIR light does not directly ionize water molecules, it can influence their structure in several ways:

1. Vibrational Resonance: Water molecules have natural vibrational frequencies, and NIR light is capable of resonating with these frequencies. When NIR light interacts with water molecules, it can enhance the vibrational motion of the water molecules. This increased vibrational energy may lead to changes in the structure and properties of the water.
2. Cluster Formation: Water molecules can form clusters due to hydrogen bonding. NIR light has been suggested to influence the clustering of water molecules, potentially leading to alterations in the arrangement and properties of water clusters.
3. Temperature Effects: NIR light can induce heating in water molecules by increasing their kinetic energy. The temperature rise associated with NIR exposure may contribute to changes in water structure and dynamics.
4. Hydrogen Bonding: NIR light can influence the strength and dynamics of hydrogen bonds between water molecules. Changes in hydrogen bonding patterns may affect the overall structure and properties of water.

​The concept of NIR light influencing the structuring of water into exclusion zone (EZ) water, also known as the fourth phase of water, is associated with the work of Dr. Gerald Pollack. According to Pollack's research, EZ water differs in its molecular arrangement from ordinary water, showing a structured pattern that extends beyond the traditional liquid structure.

Formation of Exclusion Zone (EZ) Water:

1. Light Absorption: Near-Infrared light is thought to be absorbed by certain molecules, particularly chromophores, present in water. This absorption may trigger changes in the molecular arrangement of water molecules, leading to the formation of structured zones known as exclusion zones.
2. Structured Water Molecules: EZ water is characterized by a more ordered structure, where water molecules align in a way that creates a distinct phase with unique properties. This structured water has been suggested to have enhanced stability and a higher viscosity compared to regular water.

Influence on Mitochondrial Function:

1. Increased Cellular Energy Production: Mitochondria, often referred to as the powerhouse of the cell, play a crucial role in energy production through processes like oxidative phosphorylation. Some theories propose that EZ water, with its structured nature, may have properties that enhance mitochondrial function.
2. Improved Cellular Communication: Structured water may influence intercellular communication, potentially enhancing signaling pathways vital for cellular processes. Improved communication between cells could contribute to better overall cellular function, including mitochondrial activities.
3. Reduced Oxidative Stress: The structured nature of EZ water has been associated with potential antioxidant-like properties. Mitochondria are susceptible to oxidative stress, and if EZ water indeed possesses antioxidant characteristics, it may contribute to a more favorable cellular environment.

It's important to note that the exact mechanisms and effects of NIR light on water structure are complex and may vary depending on factors such as the wavelength of the light, intensity, and exposure duration. The idea of NIR light structuring water has gained attention in various fields, including alternative health practices, and environmental research. The field of water structuring and its potential implications for cellular biology is still an area of active investigation within scientific communities.

Red light therapy emerges not only as a therapeutic modality but as a potent hormetic stressor, operating on a biphasic dose-response principle. In the realm of hormesis, a phenomenon where exposure to low doses of stressors triggers adaptive responses, red light therapy takes center stage by demonstrating a nuanced and beneficial relationship with the body's stress response.

Hormesis, in its essence, is the body's ability to adapt and respond positively to low doses of stress. Red light therapy, with its application of low levels of red and NIR light, acts as a hormetic stressor, initiating adaptive responses that strengthen cellular resilience and overall well-being.

The biphasic dose response of red light therapy implies that its effects on the body follow a distinctive pattern. At lower doses, red light elicits a positive response, triggering cellular repair, mitochondrial enhancement, and anti-inflammatory effects. As the dose increases, the beneficial effects continue, but there's a point where diminishing returns occur. Understanding this biphasic response allows for optimized use of red light therapy for maximum benefit.

Understanding the biphasic dose response of red light therapy allows for a personalized and optimal application. Tailoring the dose to individual needs ensures that the therapy remains within the hormetic zone, where the benefits are maximized without reaching a point of diminishing returns.

Incorporating red light therapy into your wellness routine becomes a strategic choice for embracing hormetic stress. The biphasic dose response unfolds a journey of cellular resilience, mitochondrial optimization, and enhanced well-being, showcasing red light therapy as a dynamic and adaptive ally in the pursuit of holistic health.

Red and NIR light therapy is generally considered safe with minimal side effects. However, appropriate device selection, treatment duration, and wavelength specificity are crucial for optimizing therapeutic outcomes.

It is very important to do a photosensitivity test prior to long sessions with your red light therapy device. To perform the test, turn on both the red and NIR functions on your red light therapy device and shine the light on an exposed part of your forearm, about 3 inches to 1 foot away, for 4 minutes. If you experience any discomfort or redness on your skin it is encouraged to not use your red light therapy device until you have sought professional advice from your doctor or healthcare provider.

Whether baby wipes are toxic or not depends on the ingredients. Some popular brands, such as Huggies or Pampers, that are known for their baby scent use an astounding amount of chemicals to achieve that scent.
​
These chemicals are toxic for both babies and the environment. Baby wipes using natural and organic ingredients typically do not contain these additional chemicals, making them wonderful non-toxic baby wipes. 

Many moms are well-intended to select the common brands of baby wipes. Afterall, baby wipes are packed with chemicals to make them efficient, a little more durable than toilet paper, and smell beautiful. However, some of those chemicals are not good for your baby.
​
It is in the best interest of the consumer, the mom and baby, to make sure to read the package before you purchase a pack of disposable baby wipes. Here are some ingredients to look out for:

The fragrance is a general term that is used to encompass several different ingredients. If an ingredient contributes to making the wipes smell good, it can be labeled as “fragrance.”
Many of these fragrances are petro-chemicals and are therefore toxic, and some of them are just not good for your little one’s skin. Instead, opt for fragrance-free wipes. Babies naturally smell adorable!

If you do wind up buying baby wipes that are scented, double-check the ingredient list. Companies can use the term fragrance to encompass harmful ingredients. They are not required to list the ingredients or chemicals that are used to make their baby wipes smell the way that they do because this is considered a trade secret. This means that if the fragrance is created using parabens, for example, the company does not have to tell you because it is in the “fragrance” category.

Fragrances have been linked to all sorts of health conditions, from autoimmune issues including contact dermatitis, and migraines and respiratory issues.

Make no mistake - you read that right. Formaldehyde has made headlines in recent years as it’s been found in baby wipes. This chemical is a known carcinogen, meaning that it can cause cancer.
It’s also a known irritant causing allergic reactions in babies. Additionally, formaldehyde is known to be:

• Genotoxic: damage the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer
• ​Inflammatory
• Neurotoxic: damage to the brain and nerve cells
• Hepatotoxic: damage to the liver and liver cells
• Oxidant: damage cells by starting chemical chain reactions such as lipid peroxidation, or by oxidizing DNA or proteins
• Teratogenic: cause congenital disorders in a developing embryo or fetus

Researchers have observed over half of the popular baby wipe brands that were tested released formaldehyde during a study. What is even scarier is that none of the wipes listed formaldehyde as an ingredient. 

A current examination of the scientific data collected on the exposure to formaldehyde is associated with the following health conditions and abnormal physiologic events:

This antibacterial ingredient found in soaps and other products has been linked to allergies, endocrine disruption, weight gain and inflammatory responses, and may aggravate the growth of liver and kidney tumors. It’s also used commonly as a preservative.

However, Triclosan was recently removed from antibacterial hand soaps because it can pass through the skin, which will lead to it having an effect on the body. It’s known to cause an allergic reaction as well as disrupt hormones. When triclosan is broken down, it can turn into Dioxin, which is known to cause cancer. 

Here is list of the known physiologic mechanisms in which triclosan exerts it's harmful effects:

• Anti-Fertility: an agent that is known to disrupt reproductive function
• Neurotoxic
• Abortive: an agent that can result in spontaneous abortion to pregnant mothers
• Endocrine Disruptor (Thyroid): suppresses the function of the thyroid gland which is essential for normal homeostasis
• Cardiotoxic: damages the function of the heart cells and heart function
• Cytotoxic: damages cellular function
• Genotoxic: property of chemical agents that damage the genetic information within a cell causing mutations, which may lead to cancer
• Hepatotoxic
• Sulfotransferase inhibitors: inhibits the function of the enzyme sulfotransferase, which plays a role in liver diseases

Exposure to, and the consumption of triclosan is associated with the following health conditions and abnormal physiologic events: 

Propylene glycol, also known as propane-1,2-diol, is compound used for various cosmetic, pharmaceutical and industrial applications, including as a solvent, humectant, preservative, and surfactant.

Propylene glycol consumption results in kidney, liver, and neurologic toxicity, and it is certainly not recommended for pregnant women. Propylene glycol is a skin irritant, it may increase the absorption of other harmful excipients, and disrupts permeability of the blood brain barrier.

When used in products like baby wipes, propylene glycol is intended to increase skin absorption of any ingredients more effectively, and at a quicker rate. This results in the body absorbing all of the toxic ingredients that are found in baby wipes, so it’s best to avoid this ingredient entirely. 

​Polyethylene Glycol (PEG), otherwise known as Macrogol, Carbowax and many other derivatives when combined with other substances. PEG is a synthetic chemical compound derived from petroleum that is widely used for a variety of uses, including as a moisture carrier, solvent, preservative, thickener, and much more. 

PEG is another chemical that will help the skin absorb the ingredients of the baby wipes. Even though it’s a different chemical that is used, it still does the same thing as propylene glycol, which helps your little one absorb chemicals which may include carcinogens, including ethylene oxide, and potentially dioxane depending on the manufacturer. 

PEG is classified as biologically inert by our FDA. It is the “Gold Standard” for use in many medications to increase the blood clearance time, or in other words, the time it remains in one’s system, thereby enhancing drug effect. It is also used in drug manufacturing as an excipient for long term stabilization, bulking, and other therapeutic enhancements. It is used as a coating to prevent bacterial adhesion on orthopedic screws and sutures. In addition to medical uses, PEG is also used in cosmetics, foods, industrial applications, and other health and beauty products such as soaps, shampoos, toothpastes. It is also used as an e-cigarette liquid. PEG is everywhere in our environment, which is what many have surmised has led to a high percentage of the US population developing anti-PEG antibodies. This, of course, presents a significant challenge to those who rely on this substance in their manufacturing.
​
Scientific studies to quantify the seriousness of the problem estimate that approximately 72% of the US population has acquired anti PEG antibodies. The referenced study used blood samples taken from 1990-1999 and earlier, showing a steady increase over time in the percentage of those with antibodies to PEG, making it conservative to estimate, after two decades, that the incidence is closer to 80% today. This circumstance has concerned the medical and pharmaceutical communities as an equally effective alternative has escaped identification, although several have been suggested, and because the great cost of shifting to such an alternative.

Not only is PEG a “stealth” medicinal additive, delaying blood clearance due to its properties, but it is a stealth allergen, the vast majority of the population never having heard of it and many in the healthcare industry being unaware of its antigenic properties. A physician survey found:

“Although 91% of respondents were aware of antidrug antibodies in general, only 22% were aware of APA (Anti-PEG Antibody) responses. Further, there was limited awareness (35%) of PEG’s inclusion in prescribed PEGylated therapeutics.”

Sodium benzoate is also used as a preservative, to extend the shelf-life of products, and is actually the sodium salt of benzoic acid. 

The substance is an odorless, crystalline powder made by combining benzoic acid and sodium hydroxide, per a December 2015 article in ​Biotechnology and Health Sciences​.

Chemical exposure and consumption of sodium benzoate is linked with a variety of health conditions and abnormal physiologic events, including but not limited to:​

Liou, Yujie Linda, et al. “Formaldehyde Release from Baby Wipes: Analysis Using the Chromotropic Acid Method.” Dermatitis, vol. 30, no. 3, May 2019, pp. 207–212, https://doi.org/10.1097/der.0000000000000478. 

Steinemann, Anne. “Health and Societal Effects from Exposure to Fragranced Consumer Products.” Preventive Medicine Reports, vol. 5, Mar. 2017, pp. 45–47, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2016.11.011.

McCann, Donna, et al. “Food Additives and Hyperactive Behaviour in 3-Year-Old and 8/9-Year-Old Children in the Community: A Randomised, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled Trial.” The Lancet, vol. 370, no. 9598, Nov. 2007, pp. 1560–1567, www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(07)61306-3/fulltext, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(07)61306-3.
​
Nair, B. “Final Report on the Safety Assessment of Benzyl Alcohol, Benzoic Acid, and Sodium Benzoate.” International Journal of Toxicology, vol. 20 Suppl 3, 2001, pp. 23–50, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11766131, https://doi.org/10.1080/10915810152630729.

Fujitani, T. “Short-Term Effect of Sodium Benzoate in F344 Rats and B6C3F1 Mice.” Toxicology Letters, vol. 69, no. 2, 1 Aug. 1993, pp. 171–179, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/8212059/, https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-4274(93)90102-4.

Tsay, Huey-Jen, et al. “Treatment with Sodium Benzoate Leads to Malformation of Zebrafish Larvae.” Neurotoxicology and Teratology, vol. 29, no. 5, 1 Sept. 2007, pp. 562–569, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17644306/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ntt.2007.05.001.

Hu, Mingqian, et al. “[Analysis of Sodium Benzoate Biotoxicity by Atomic Force Microscope].” Sheng Wu Gong Cheng Xue Bao = Chinese Journal of Biotechnology, vol. 24, no. 8, 1 Aug. 2008, pp. 1428–1432, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/18998546/, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1872-2075(08)60064-3.

Oyanagi, Kazuhiko, et al. “Cytotoxicities of Sodium Benzoate in Primary Culture of Hepatocytes from Adult Rat Liver.” The Tohoku Journal of Experimental Medicine, vol. 152, no. 1, 1987, pp. 47–51, www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/tjem1920/152/1/152_1_47/_article, https://doi.org/10.1620/tjem.152.47.

Haque, Haroon, et al. “Effectiveness of Sodium Benzoate as a Freshwater Low Toxicity Antifoulant When Dispersed in Solution and Entrapped in Silicone Coatings.” Biofouling, vol. 21, no. 2, 2005, pp. 109–119, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/16109600/, https://doi.org/10.1080/08927010500222551. 

O’Connor, J. E., et al. “The Potentiation of Ammonia Toxicity by Sodium Benzoate Is Prevented by L-Carnitine.” Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications, vol. 145, no. 2, 15 June 1987, pp. 817–824, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3593373/, https://doi.org/10.1016/0006-291x(87)91038-2. 

Stefanidou, M., et al. “Assessing Food Additive Toxicity Using a Cell Model.” Veterinary and Human Toxicology, vol. 45, no. 2, 1 Mar. 2003, pp. 103–105, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/12678300/. 

Mpountoukas, P., et al. “Cytogenetic Study in Cultured Human Lymphocytes Treated with Three Commonly Used Preservatives.” Food and Chemical Toxicology, vol. 46, no. 7, July 2008, pp. 2390–2393, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fct.2008.03.021.

Whittaker, A., et al. “Toxic Additives in Medication for Preterm Infants.” Archives of Disease in Childhood. Fetal and Neonatal Edition, vol. 94, no. 4, 1 July 2009, pp. F236-240, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19158148/, https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2008.146035. 

Zosel, Amy, et al. “Severe Lactic Acidosis after an Iatrogenic Propylene Glycol Overdose.” Pharmacotherapy, vol. 30, no. 2, Feb. 2010, pp. 219–219, https://doi.org/10.1592/phco.30.2.219. 

Bailey, David N. “Propylene Glycol as a Vehicle for Percutaneous Absorption of Therapeutic Agents.” Journal of Analytical Toxicology, vol. 16, no. 2, 1 Mar. 1992, pp. 97–98, https://doi.org/10.1093/jat/16.2.97. 

Sood, Rohit, et al. “Quantitative Evaluation of the Effect of Propylene Glycol on BBB Permeability.” Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging: JMRI, vol. 25, no. 1, 1 Jan. 2007, pp. 39–47, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/17173307/, https://doi.org/10.1002/jmri.20802. Accessed 14 Dec. 2023.

Den Hond, Elly, et al. “Human Exposure to Endocrine Disrupting Chemicals and Fertility: A Case–Control Study in Male Subfertility Patients.” Environment International, vol. 84, Nov. 2015, pp. 154–160, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.07.017.

​Jurewicz, Joanna, et al. “Environmental Levels of Triclosan and Male Fertility.” Environmental Science and Pollution Research, vol. 25, no. 6, 7 Dec. 2017, pp. 5484–5490, www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5823964/, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-0866-5. 

Wang, Xiaoli, et al. “Triclosan Causes Spontaneous Abortion Accompanied by Decline of Estrogen Sulfotransferase Activity in Humans and Mice.” Scientific Reports, vol. 5, no. 1, 15 Dec. 2015, p. 18252, www.nature.com/articles/srep18252, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep18252. 

Geer, Laura A., et al. “Association of Birth Outcomes with Fetal Exposure to Parabens, Triclosan and Triclocarban in an Immigrant Population in Brooklyn, New York.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 323, no. Pt A, 5 Feb. 2017, pp. 177–183, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27156397/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2016.03.028.

Weatherly, Lisa M., et al. “Antimicrobial Agent Triclosan Is a Proton Ionophore Uncoupler of Mitochondria in Living Rat and Human Mast Cells and in Primary Human Keratinocytes.” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 36, no. 6, 23 July 2015, pp. 777–789, https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3209. 

López-Pacheco, Itzel Y., et al. “Anthropogenic Contaminants of High Concern: Existence in Water Resources and Their Adverse Effects.” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 690, Nov. 2019, pp. 1068–1088, tec.mx/sites/default/files/2019-08/1-s2.0-S0048969719331651-main%20%281%29.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.052. 

Paul, Katie B., et al. “Developmental Triclosan Exposure Decreases Maternal and Neonatal Thyroxine in Rats.” Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry, vol. 29, no. 12, 15 Oct. 2010, pp. 2840–2844, https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.339.

Huang, Wei, et al. “Lipid Metabolism Disorders Contribute to Hepatotoxicity of Triclosan in Mice.” Journal of Hazardous Materials, vol. 384, 15 Feb. 2020, p. 121310, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0304389419312646, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2019.121310. 

Rodríguez, Pablo E. A., and Mónica S. Sanchez. “Maternal Exposure to Triclosan Impairs Thyroid Homeostasis and Female Pubertal Development in Wistar Rat Offspring.” Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health, Part A, vol. 73, no. 24, 29 Oct. 2010, pp. 1678–1688, https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2010.516241. 

Tobar, Steven, et al. “Triclosan Promotes Epicutaneous Sensitization to Peanut in Mice.” Clinical and Translational Allergy, vol. 6, no. 1, 5 Apr. 2016, https://doi.org/10.1186/s13601-016-0102-2. 


Park, Bo Kyung, et al. “Effects of Triclosan on Neural Stem Cell Viability and Survival.” Biomolecules & Therapeutics, vol. 24, no. 1, 1 Jan. 2016, pp. 99–107, www.biomolther.org/journal/view.html?volume=24&number=1&spage=99&year=2016, https://doi.org/10.4062/biomolther.2015.164. 

Pollock, Tyler, et al. “Triclosan Exacerbates the Presence of 14C-Bisphenol a in Tissues of Female and Male Mice.” Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology, vol. 278, no. 2, 15 July 2014, pp. 116–123, www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0041008X14001574, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.taap.2014.04.017. 

Shim, Juyoung, et al. “Triclosan Is a Mitochondrial Uncoupler in Live Zebrafish.” Journal of Applied Toxicology, vol. 36, no. 12, 28 Mar. 2016, pp. 1662–1667, https://doi.org/10.1002/jat.3311. 

Lin, Dasong, et al. “Potential Biochemical and Genetic Toxicity of Triclosan as an Emerging Pollutant on Earthworms (Eisenia Fetida).” Chemosphere, vol. 81, no. 10, Nov. 2010, pp. 1328–1333, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2010.08.027. 

Stoker, Tammy E., et al. “Triclosan Exposure Modulates Estrogen-Dependent Responses in the Female Wistar Rat.” Toxicological Sciences, vol. 117, no. 1, 1 Sept. 2010, pp. 45–53, academic.oup.com/toxsci/article-abstract/117/1/45/1682020?redirectedFrom=fulltext, https://doi.org/10.1093/toxsci/kfq180.

Pearce, Elizabeth N., and Lewis E. Braverman. “Environmental Pollutants and the Thyroid.” Best Practice & Research Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism, vol. 23, no. 6, Dec. 2009, pp. 801–813, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.beem.2009.06.003.

Jm, Braun. “Early-Life Exposure to EDCs: Role in Childhood Obesity and Neurodevelopment.” Nature Reviews. Endocrinology, 1 Mar. 2017, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/27857130/.

Zeng, Liudan, et al. “LINE-1 Gene Hypomethylation and P16 Gene Hypermethylation in HepG2 Cells Induced by Low-Dose and Long-Term Triclosan Exposure: The Role of Hydroxyl Group.” Toxicology in Vitro: An International Journal Published in Association with BIBRA, vol. 34, 1 Aug. 2016, pp. 35–44, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/26970259/, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tiv.2016.03.002. 

Wang, Cai-Feng, and Ying Tian. “Reproductive Endocrine-Disrupting Effects of Triclosan: Population Exposure, Present Evidence and Potential Mechanisms.” Environmental Pollution, vol. 206, Nov. 2015, pp. 195–201, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2015.07.001.

Ginsberg, Gary L., and Sophie J. Balk. “Consumer Products as Sources of Chemical Exposures to Children.” Current Opinion in Pediatrics, vol. 28, no. 2, Apr. 2016, pp. 235–242, https://doi.org/10.1097/mop.0000000000000329. 

Buth, Jeffrey M., et al. “Dioxin Photoproducts of Triclosan and Its Chlorinated Derivatives in Sediment Cores.” Environmental Science & Technology, vol. 44, no. 12, 15 June 2010, pp. 4545–4551, sludgenews.org/resources/documents/Buth_Dioxin-Triclosan.pdf, https://doi.org/10.1021/es1001105. 

Christopher, M. M., et al. “Propylene Glycol Ingestion Causes D-Lactic Acidosis.” Laboratory Investigation; a Journal of Technical Methods and Pathology, vol. 62, no. 1, 1 Jan. 1990, pp. 114–118, pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/2296157/. 

Yang, Qi, et al. “Analysis of Pre-Existing IgG and IgM Antibodies against Polyethylene Glycol (PEG) in the General Population.” Analytical Chemistry, vol. 88, no. 23, 16 Nov. 2016, pp. 11804–11812, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.analchem.6b03437.

The best organic diapers are not only safe for the environment but also safe for your baby. But, it is challenging to pick the best diaper brand when every other brand touts their diaper as the safest. Today, there are two sustainable diaper options - cloth diapers and disposable diapers. These two diapers help in two ways; reduce the buildup of diapers in landfills and protect your baby from the harsh chemicals, such as chlorine, in conventional diapers.

With the organic diapers, your baby will not suffer the chemicals' effects, and the environment will thank you for it. Cloth diapers are baby-friendly and environment-friendly, but although they might be the best natural diapers, they are not mum-friendly, which is why organic diapers rock.

When shopping for diapers, only go for a chemical-free diaper (watch out for chemicals such as parabens, phthalates, and chlorine), synthetic fragrance-free, and free of dyes. Again, ensure that all the materials used to make the diaper are natural or organic and are biodegradable.

Besides making the environment unsightly, these disposable diapers contain chemical ingredients that could harm the environment, animals, and human beings. According to the Real Diaper Association, some components include polyethylene, petroleum, gelling material, perfume, and polypropylene. They also have non-renewable petroleum products.

Some of the disposable diapers contain chemicals that might lead to the release of dioxin into the environment. Dioxin is a toxin linked to cancer and health concerns in fetuses. ​

Davidson, Laurel. “The Only Way to Change Diapers Is One Baby at a Time. Real Diaper Association.” Real Diaper Association, 14 May 2015, realdiapers.org/diaper-facts.

World Health Organization. “Dioxins and Their Effects on Human Health.” Who.int, World Health Organization, 4 Oct. 2016, www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/dioxins-and-their-effects-on-human-health.

Manikkam, Mohan, et al. “Dioxin (TCDD) Induces Epigenetic Transgenerational Inheritance of Adult Onset Disease and Sperm Epimutations.” PLoS ONE, vol. 7, no. 9, 26 Sept. 2012, p. e46249, https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0046249. Accessed 12 Mar. 2019.

“Chlorine “Allergy.”” ACAAI Public Website, 15 Jan. 2015, acaai.org/allergies/types/allergy-myths/chlorine-allergy.

Steinemann, Anne. “Fragranced Consumer Products: Exposures and Effects from Emissions.” Air Quality, Atmosphere & Health, vol. 9, no. 8, 20 Oct. 2016, pp. 861–866, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11869-016-0442-z.

Spencer, P., et al. “Neurotoxic Fragrance Produces Ceroid and Myelin Disease.” Science, vol. 204, no. 4393, 11 May 1979, pp. 633–635, https://doi.org/10.1126/science.432669. Accessed 13 Nov. 2019.

​Kazemi, Zahra, et al. “Evaluation of Pollutants in Perfumes, Colognes and Health Effects on the Consumer: A Systematic Review.” Journal of Environmental Health Science and Engineering, vol. 20, no. 1, 3 Feb. 2022, pp. 589–598, https://doi.org/10.1007/s40201-021-00783-x.

​​Arthritis is a significant problem in both humans and animals that may occur at any age but is particularly common in older individuals. In dogs, both degenerative and inflammatory arthropathies may occur but the most common form of joint disease is osteoarthritis (OA4), a complex, progressive disease characterized by the degeneration of articular cartilage and by the formation of new bone (osteophytes) at joint margins. Inflammation of the synovial membrane may also be present in many cases of OA, but is a variable feature throughout the course of the disease. Conversely, synovitis is the major pathological feature of the inflammatory joint diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis.
​
Degeneration of articular cartilage in OA is usually associated with some predisposing joint abnormality that produces focal areas of increased stress within the joint, resulting in accelerated turnover of cartilage matrix. Although both the synthetic and degradative activities of chondrocytes are increased, the balance is tipped toward matrix depletion with a net loss of cartilage matrix components. Joint enlargement may be evident in some affected dogs and is related to osteophyte production, joint effusion resulting from synovial inflammation and thickening of the joint capsule. Structural damage may exist for some time before clinical signs of OA are apparent, and most cases ultimately present with stiffness or lameness. Lameness, attributed to a combination of joint pain and restricted movement of the joint, may be gradual in onset or may present acutely following minor trauma or excessive exercise. A number of mechanisms are thought to be involved in the pathogenesis of joint pain itself, but one factor is the presence of synovial inflammation.
​
Dietary factors can potentially modify some of the underlying processes involved in arthritis, including modulation of the inflammatory response, provision of nutrients for cartilage repair and protection against oxidative damage. Where effective, dietary management may help to reduce or eliminate the need for conventional drugs, some of which are associated with adverse secondary effects. Shellfish supplements have been used as a traditional remedy for arthritis in humans and, in recent years, interest has focused on the potential benefits of a nutritional supplement prepared from the New Zealand green-lipped mussel, Perna canaliculus (1., 2., 3.). Although green-lipped mussel (GLM) is known to contain anti-inflammatory components and other nutrients that may benefit joint health, the precise mechanism(s) of its actions are unknown. Heat processing of GLM has been shown to destroy its activity. Therefore, the processing of whole GLM and incorporation of the GLM product into food products requires special care and processing techniques to avoid destroying any efficacy of the final product.

In a series of clinical studies, researched have evaluated the efficacy of GLM powder in alleviating arthritic signs in dogs. The performance of GLM was investigated as a powdered supplement on top of a standard diet and when incorporated into one of two processed dietary products, a semimoist treat and a dry main meal diet. Both of these products used low-temperature manufacturing processes designed to retain the efficacy of the GLM.

One of the most remarkable features of SneakPeek is its ability to deliver accurate results as early as 6 weeks into gestation. If you're eager to know your baby's gender before the traditional ultrasound, SneakPeek has you covered. Plus, if you're not quite at 6 weeks yet, simply keep the unopened test kit – it remains usable for up to a year after purchase.

SneakPeek stands by the accuracy of its testing method. In the rare event that your test result does not align with the gender of your newborn baby, SneakPeek offers a full refund. Your satisfaction and confidence in the results are of utmost importance.

What is the advantage of organic? Organic grass-fed beef is a nutritional powerhouse, free from the harmful additives found in conventionally raised beef. The cattle graze on pesticide-free, natural pastures, avoiding exposure to synthetic chemicals. 

In the intricate web of agricultural practices, certain pesticides, notably glyphosate, have come under scrutiny for their neurotoxic properties and potential associations with cancer. 

Glyphosate is a pervasive concern. Glyphosate, a widely used herbicide, has become emblematic of the potential risks associated with pesticide exposure. As a key component of many weed-killing formulations, it has found its way into our food supply, raising questions about its impact on human health.

Numerous studies have illuminated the neurotoxic nature of glyphosate. Exposure to this herbicide has been linked to disruptions in neurological functions, potentially contributing to cognitive impairments and other nervous system disorders.

Scientific literature has documented a correlation between glyphosate exposure and an increased risk of certain cancers. Prolonged or intense contact with glyphosate has been associated with higher incidences of non-Hodgkin lymphoma and other malignancies.

Scientific studies suggest that the consumption of grass-fed beef can contribute to lower inflammation levels. The natural diet of grass-fed cattle yields meat with a healthier omega-6 to omega-3 fatty acid ratio, potentially reducing inflammatory responses in the body. It is not that inflammation is inherently bad, but rather the chronic elevated nature of inflammation that leads to downstream effects.

Embrace endocrine wellness with organic grass-fed beef. Hormones administered to conventionally raised cows can disrupt the endocrine system, potentially leading to health issues. Organic grass-fed beef, free from artificial hormones, supports hormonal balance, promoting optimal health.
​​
Enjoy the holistic advantages of organic grass-fed beef, savoring not just the exceptional taste but also the wealth of health benefits it brings to your table. Make an informed choice for a nourished and vibrant life.

James Corbett delivers a live presentation on How to Research Online to the Greater Reset Activation III conference on January 30, 2022. In this demonstration, James shares his screen while he answers some research questions from his listeners.

In this episode, peak performance expert, Steven Kotler, shares the top 15 things that peak performers know about focus that most people don’t. You’ll discover how to focus, how to improve your focus and concentration spans over time, and how to shortcut your way into paying attention. Steven also clearly describes flow state triggers, goal setting techniques, and other habits you can use to maximize peak performance. 
Listen out for:

• The 15 things that peak performers do surrounding focus, attention, and flow.
• What peak performers do to shortcut their way into attention.
• Flow’s most important trigger.

Lumbopelvic stabilization refers to the ability to control and maintain stability in the lumbar spine and pelvis during movement and activity. It involves the coordinated activation of muscles surrounding the lumbar spine and pelvis to provide support and protection to these vulnerable areas.

​Research by Richardson, Hodges, Hides, and others has highlighted the significance of lumbopelvic stability in preventing low back pain, pelvic girdle pain, and various other musculoskeletal conditions. Dysfunction in lumbopelvic stabilization can lead to poor posture, improper movement patterns, and increased risk of injury.

In rehabilitation settings, lumbopelvic stabilization exercises are commonly prescribed to individuals recovering from low back pain, pelvic girdle dysfunction, and other musculoskeletal injuries. These exercises aim to improve muscle strength, endurance, and coordination in the muscles surrounding the lumbar spine and pelvis, ultimately enhancing stability and reducing pain.

Additionally, lumbopelvic stabilization exercises are effective in preventing musculoskeletal injuries and conditions, especially among individuals with sedentary lifestyles or occupations that involve prolonged sitting. By strengthening the core muscles and promoting proper alignment and movement patterns, these exercises help mitigate the risk of developing chronic pain and dysfunction.

Incorporating feedback tools into lumbopelvic stabilization training can enhance the effectiveness of rehabilitation and prevention programs. Blood pressure cuffs, for example, can be used as biofeedback devices to provide real-time feedback on intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) during lumbopelvic stabilization exercises.

​Maintaining optimal IAP is essential for lumbopelvic stability, as it helps support the lumbar spine and pelvis, reducing the risk of injury and enhancing performance. By using a blood pressure cuff as a feedback tool, individuals can ensure they are activating the appropriate muscles and maintaining proper IAP throughout their exercises.

Richardson, Carolyn, et al. Therapeutic Exercise for Lumbo-Pelvic Stabilisation. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 2004.

We are often insulated from our environment. In the winter, we warm our homes. In the summer, we cool them. But we may be unintentionally harming our health by not challenging our bodies to deal with the ambient temperature. A panel of experts today explains how we can benefit from cold therapy, offering practical first steps for those who are new to the practice. They also cover the problems with artificial light and the importance of getting more sunlight on our skin. They share how living more in tune with nature, as our ancestors did, can help alleviate a host of health conditions and reinvigorate the body.
​
The panelists are Dr. Mike T. Nelson, Katie Newman, Thaddeus Owen, Christa Rymal, Heidi Sime, and Nic Zahasky.