 In a startling revelation, recently declassified documents have brought to the forefront a chilling aspect of military strategy: the deliberate use of forest fires as weapons of war. Among these documents is a particularly intriguing report sponsored by the Defense Advanced Research Project Agency (DARPA) which delves into the potential applications of incendiary tactics in military operations. The document, published by the U.S. Department of Defense in 1970, outlines various techniques and scenarios wherein fires can be utilized to gain tactical advantages in combat situations. From creating smoke screens to obstruct enemy visibility to initiating large-scale forest fires to disrupt enemy supply lines and infrastructure, the report explores the myriad ways in which fire can be weaponized to achieve military objectives. Of particular concern is the section detailing the use of forest fires as a means of psychological warfare, wherein the intentional ignition of fires in enemy territory is aimed at instilling fear, confusion, and panic among civilian populations. By targeting forests, which are often integral to local ecosystems and communities, military planners sought to inflict not only physical damage but also psychological trauma, thereby undermining enemy morale and resolve. The implications of such tactics are profound, extending far beyond the immediate battlefield. Forest fires, once ignited, can rapidly escalate into uncontrollable infernos, engulfing vast expanses of land, devouring flora and fauna, and posing grave risks to human life and property. The indiscriminate nature of fire knows no bounds, sparing neither military targets nor civilian populations in its destructive path. Moreover, the use of forest fires as military weapons raises serious ethical and environmental concerns. The deliberate ignition of fires in densely forested areas not only poses immediate risks to human safety but also inflicts long-term damage to fragile ecosystems, biodiversity, and natural resources. The toll on wildlife habitats, air quality, water sources, and soil integrity can be irreparable, perpetuating ecological devastation for generations to come. In addition to the ecological ramifications, the revelation of forest fires being employed as military weapons underscores the nefarious tactics employed by elements within the so-called "deep state." This clandestine network, operating outside the purview of democratic oversight and accountability, is purportedly driven by ulterior motives and clandestine agendas that prioritize power and control over the welfare of people and planet. The use of forest fires as instruments of war epitomizes the callous disregard for human life, environmental stewardship, and international law exhibited by clandestine actors operating within the deep state. By weaponizing natural disasters for geopolitical gain, these shadowy forces perpetuate a cycle of destruction and suffering that reverberates far beyond the confines of the battlefield. In light of these revelations, it is incumbent upon governments, civil society organizations, and concerned citizens worldwide to demand transparency, accountability, and responsible stewardship in matters of national security and defense. The wanton destruction wrought by forest fires used as military weapons serves as a stark reminder of the urgent need for vigilance, oversight, and the safeguarding of our shared planet and its inhabitants. Only through collective action and unwavering commitment to peace, justice, and environmental preservation can we hope to mitigate the grave threats posed by the dark underbelly of militarism and covert warfare. Manipulating Climate Change NarrativesOne of the most insidious aspects of the use of forest fires as military weapons lies in the potential manipulation of climate change narratives for ulterior motives. In the wake of devastating fires, clandestine actors within the deep state may exploit the chaos and destruction to advance agendas aimed at consolidating control and power over the masses. By attributing forest fires to "climate change" and framing them as the result of extreme weather events purportedly exacerbated by human activity, these actors seek to justify intrusive policies and measures that encroach upon individual liberties and civil rights. This includes the implementation of carbon tracking and taxation systems, stringent environmental regulations, and centralized control over energy production and consumption. Under the guise of addressing climate-related emergencies, governments and supranational organizations may exploit public fear and uncertainty to expand their authority and influence, thereby furthering agendas of social engineering and population control. The narrative of impending environmental catastrophe serves as a pretext for imposing draconian measures that curtail freedom of movement, expression, and economic autonomy. Moreover, the misattribution of forest fires to climate change conveniently deflects attention away from the role of military actors in their deliberate ignition and propagation. By shifting blame to abstract concepts like "global warming" and "carbon emissions," covert agendas of militarization and geopolitical maneuvering remain obscured, allowing clandestine actors to operate with impunity and evade accountability. In this way, forest fires become not only tools of physical destruction but also instruments of psychological manipulation and social control. The exploitation of climate change narratives serves to perpetuate a climate of fear and dependency, wherein populations acquiesce to authoritarian measures in the name of environmental salvation. To combat such nefarious tactics, it is imperative that citizens remain vigilant, informed, and empowered to challenge official narratives and question the motives behind proposed policies and interventions. By advocating for transparency, accountability, and evidence-based decision-making, individuals can resist the manipulation of climate change narratives for political gain and safeguard democratic principles and human rights. In the face of converging crises – from environmental degradation to militarization and authoritarianism – solidarity, resilience, and collective action are paramount. Only through a concerted effort to expose and oppose covert agendas of manipulation and control can we hope to build a more just, equitable, and sustainable world for present and future generations. Directed Energy One of the most insidious aspects of the use of forest fires as military weapons lies in the speculation surrounding their origins, which range from natural causes to deliberate human intervention and even advanced technologies such as Directed Energy Weapons (DEWs). As fires rage through vast expanses of woodland, leaving devastation in their wake, questions abound regarding the true perpetrators behind these infernos. While conventional explanations point to factors like arson and lightning strikes, a growing body of evidence suggests the involvement of more clandestine actors with access to sophisticated weaponry and covert operations. Among the most concerning theories is the utilization of Directed Energy Weapons, capable of emitting highly focused energy beams to ignite and propagate fires over long distances with pinpoint accuracy. Instances such as the operations conducted by the Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) in Maui, where DEWs are tested and developed for military applications, have fueled speculation regarding their potential role in the creation of forest fires. Although the AFRL maintains that their research is aimed at enhancing national security and defense capabilities, concerns persist regarding the unintended consequences of deploying such technology in civilian environments. The prospect of military entities wielding Directed Energy Weapons to instigate or exacerbate forest fires raises profound ethical and legal questions about the use of force and the protection of civilian populations and natural habitats. In the absence of transparency and accountability, suspicions linger regarding the true intentions behind these operations and their impact on communities and ecosystems. Moreover, the intersection of DEW technology with narratives of climate change further complicates the discourse surrounding forest fires, as speculation abounds regarding the potential manipulation of environmental crises for geopolitical ends. By exploiting public fears and vulnerabilities, clandestine actors may seek to exploit the chaos and destruction wrought by fires to advance agendas of control and domination. In this volatile landscape of uncertainty and speculation, it becomes increasingly challenging to discern truth from deception and fact from fiction. As communities grapple with the aftermath of forest fires and the specter of future conflagrations looms large, it is imperative that rigorous investigation and scrutiny be applied to unraveling the complexities of these crises and holding accountable those responsible for their creation and escalation. Ultimately, the manipulation of forest fires for military purposes and the exploitation of climate change narratives for political gain represent grave threats to global stability and security. Only through vigilant oversight, informed discourse, and collective action can we hope to confront the multifaceted challenges posed by the weaponization of natural disasters and safeguard the well-being of humanity and the planet. references“Directed Energy – Air Force Research Laboratory.” Afresearchlab.com, afresearchlab.com/technology/directed-energy/.
Defense Technical Information Center. DTIC AD0509724: Forest Fire as a Military Weapon. Internet Archive, US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, 1 June 1970, archive.org/details/DTIC_AD0509724/page/n1/mode/2up?view=theater.
0 Comments
In two groundbreaking episodes of The HighWire, Del Bigtree tackles the highly controversial topic of weather modification and geoengineering. Joining Del are two of the most prominent voices in this field: Jim Lee, founder of ClimateViewer.com, and Dane Wigington, Lead Researcher for GeoEngineering Watch. Together, they explore the layers of mystery, controversy, and science surrounding what’s happening in our skies.
A Decade of Data: Jim Lee and the History of Weather Modification
Jim Lee has spent over a decade archiving government documents, patents, and scientific research on weather modification. His website, ClimateViewer.com, offers the public unprecedented access to this critical information. From early reports of jet trails in newspapers like Spokane Daily Chronicle to modern scientific studies published by Science Direct, Jim paints a detailed picture of how atmospheric manipulation has evolved.
In discussing topics such as cloud seeding, jet fuel emissions, and solar radiation management, Del challenges Jim to unpack the mechanisms, ethics, and environmental implications of geoengineering. Historic examples like Operation Popeye—detailed in Popular Science—highlight the use of weather as a weapon during the Vietnam War, while contemporary practices, like those reported by The Guardian, showcase the global scope of weather control efforts, such as China's modification of the weather for political events. The Taboo Topic: Chemtrails and Weather Modification
Dane Wigington takes the conversation further, addressing the hotly debated topic of chemtrails. Based on research from GeoEngineering Watch, Dane outlines evidence from U.S. patents, military whistleblowers, and laboratory-analyzed cloud seeding samples.
Wigington’s findings suggest that weather modification may go beyond localized projects, hinting at a global operation. The documentary The Dimming by GeoEngineering Watch delves into these claims, supported by data from sources like the National Weather Modification Policy Act of 1976 and the Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques. Del presses Wigington on the potential environmental and health consequences of geoengineering. Reports such as those from MIT Technology Review and Euronews reveal growing concerns about the environmental costs of such programs. China’s weather modification program, for example, has allocated 8.8 billion yuan, as reported by Xinhua Net, to influence local climates and mitigate farming damage. Military Involvement: Owning the Weather?
Military applications of geoengineering have long been a point of contention. Documents like the Department of Defense's Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025 suggest ambitions for climate control as a strategic advantage. Dane Wigington connects these plans to current global practices, citing the UN Convention on Environmental Modification Techniques as an attempt to limit hostile uses of such technology.
However, questions remain. Whistleblowers, gag orders (PEER), and restricted information hint at a veil of secrecy surrounding military and government involvement in geoengineering efforts. Environmental and Ethical Dilemmas
The environmental implications of geoengineering remain a major concern. Research from Science Direct explores the chemical composition of particulate matter from jet emissions, raising alarms about their impact on human health and ecosystems. Meanwhile, the ethics of global geoengineering programs are hotly debated, with organizations like The Guardian calling for moratoriums to address the unknown risks.
The role of powerful entities in these efforts also raises questions. Bill Gates, for instance, has drawn criticism for his involvement in geoengineering projects while simultaneously becoming the largest private owner of U.S. farmland. Del and his guests explore whether such influence consolidates control over weather and food systems. Legislation and Regulation: Controversy in the Courts
As awareness grows, so does public pushback. Legislation like New Hampshire's House Bill 1700-FN aims to ban atmospheric geoengineering, while global aviation emissions pacts face scrutiny for their enforcement and transparency.
Historical Parallels: Lessons from the Past
Historical examples of large-scale atmospheric experiments, such as the spraying of radioactive materials in St. Louis during the mid-20th century, serve as grim reminders of the potential for misuse. Reports from Daily Mail and MOSpace outline the health impacts on vulnerable populations.
The Bigger Picture: Climate and Security
The Pentagon has classified climate change as a national security threat, and bodies like the UN and World Economic Forum are pushing for tighter emissions regulations. Meanwhile, public figures like Pope Francis and Elon Musk weigh in on environmental crises, from "global boiling" to the transition to electric vehicles.
A call to action
Del’s conversation with Jim Lee and Dane Wigington concludes with a shared call for transparency, education, and accountability. Both experts encourage viewers to engage with resources like ClimateViewer.com and GeoEngineering Watch to stay informed.
As Del puts it, “What’s happening above us affects everything below.” The sky, once a symbol of freedom and endless possibility, has become a battleground for control, science, and secrecy. references
Who is Bill Gates? A software developer? A businessman? A philanthropist? A global health expert?
This question, once merely academic, is becoming a very real question for those who are beginning to realize that Gates' unimaginable wealth has been used to gain control over every corner of the fields of public health, medical research and vaccine development. And now that we are presented with the very problem that Gates has been talking about for years, we will soon find that this software developer with no medical training is going to leverage that wealth into control over the fates of billions of people.
In the details of the document, air temperature within the eye and in the outflow of a hurricane is able to be raised by flying scores of jet planes with afterburners in the structure. It should be noted that small changes in temperature on a large scale bring in large changes in other variables on the smaller scale to change the direction and intensity of the hurricane.  Image from U.S. patent No.: 0072297 A1 - displaying a cross-sectional side view of the hurricane with jet planes flying through out the eye of the hurricane. BackgroundCloud seeding is a known process for artificially modifying the weather by injecting a composition into a cloud for formation of an ice freezing nuclei. Silver iodide is a well known substance used for cloud seeding. The Storm fury project carried out by the US Government for several years focused on hurricane formation suppression by means of aerial dispersion of silver iodide. This project was evaluated as a failure and cancelled. In 1976, William Gray et al., suggested that the use of carbon black (or soot) might be a good way to modify tropical cyclones. The idea was that one could burn a large quantity of a heavy petroleum to produce vast numbers of carbon black particles that would be released on the edges of the tropical cyclone in the boundary layer. These carbon black aerosols would produce a heat source simply by absorbing the solar radiation and transferring the heat directly to the atmosphere. This would provide for the initiation of thunderstorm activity outside of the tropical cyclone core and weaken the eye wall convection. In 1958, the US Naval Research laboratory carried out some experiments to monitor clouds seeded with soot but the results were inconclusive. Advantages As described in the patent, there are several "advantages", for the existence and application of this technology:
Patents Related to Weather Modification Below is a list composed of some of the patents that describe abilities to modify weather:
References
Project Popeye - Cloud Seeding During Vietnam War
Project Popeye was a highly classified weather modification program in Southeast Asia during 1967–1972. The objective of the program was to produce sufficient rainfall along these lines of communication to interdict or at least interfere with truck traffic between North and South Vietnam.
A test phase of Project Popeye was approved by State and Defense and conducted during October 1966 in a strip of the Lao Panhandle generally east of the Bolovens Plateau in the valley of the Se Kong River. The test was conducted without consultation with Lao authorities (but with Ambassador Sullivan’s knowledge and concurrence). During the test phase, more than 50 cloud seeding experiments were conducted. The results are viewed by DOD as outstandingly successful.
The experiments were deemed undeniably successful, indicating that, at least under weather and terrain conditions such as those involved, the U.S. Government has realized a capability of significant weather modification. If anything, the tests were “too successful”—neither the volume of induced rainfall nor the extent of area affected can be precisely predicted (Department of State - Office of the Historian, 1967). Project Stormfury - An Attempt to Modify Hurricanes
Project Stormfury was an attempt to weaken tropical cyclones by flying aircraft into them and seeding with silver iodide.
The project was run by the United States Government from 1962 to 1983.The hypothesis was that the silver iodide would cause supercooled water in the storm to freeze, disrupting the inner structure of the hurricane. This led to the seeding of several Atlantic hurricanes. However, it was later shown that this hypothesis was incorrect. In reality, it was determined most hurricanes do not contain enough supercooled water for cloud seeding to be effective. Additionally, researchers found that unseeded hurricanes often undergo the same structural changes that were expected from seeded hurricanes. This finding called Stormfury’s successes into question, as the changes reported now had a natural explanation. The last experimental flight was flown in 1971, due to a lack of candidate storms and a changeover in NOAA’s fleet. More than a decade after the last modification experiment, Project Stormfury was officially canceled. Although a failure in its goal of reducing the destructiveness of hurricanes, Project Stormfury was not without merit. The observational data and storm lifecycle research generated by Stormfury helped improve meteorologists’ ability to forecast the movement and intensity of future hurricanes. Former CIA Director, John Brennan, Discusses SAI or "Chemtrails"
A number of government agencies have developed plans for research and operational programs in weather and climate modification. Here is a report from 1966, in which various agencies expressed interest in the ability to modify the weather. In 2015, the National Academy of Sciences conducted a 21-month geoengineering study, which happened be funded by the "U.S Intelligence community", also known as the Central Intelligence Agency (National Academy of Sciences, 2015). Below is a video of John Brennan, former CIA director from March 2013 to January 2017, speaking about stratospheric aerosol injection (SAI), commonly referred to as "chemtrails", at the Council on Foreign Relations.
Research Suggests Climate Engineering is Ineffective
Scientists at Helmholtz Centre for Ocean Research (Kiel, Germany) conducted a study where they evaluated effectiveness and risks of different geoengineering techniques, such as SRM (solar radiation management), afforestation, artificial ocean upwelling, ocean iron fertilization and ocean alkalinization.
The researchers discovered that even when applied continuously and at scales as large as currently deemed possible, all methods are, individually, either relatively ineffective with limited (o8%) warming reductions, or they have potentially severe side effects and cannot be stopped without causing rapid climate change (Keller, Feng and Oschlies, 2014). To assess their true potential and verify their side effects, such interventions require full-scale experiments that may have long-term and possibly compromise the very planetary mechanisms and ecosystems we’re trying to save. Potential Proof of Weather Manipulation
In the photos below, several abnormal cloud formations with a seemingly unnatural origin, containing straight lines and 90° angles, can be observed.
Based on the information aforementioned, toxic materials, heavy metals, and harmful chemicals are able to be positioned in the atmosphere of the planet. Many speculate that these particles may be manipulated by powerful radio frequency signals, in which a strange impact on clouds can be observed. In addition, it is claimed that these square clouds are created via electrically conductive heavy metal nanoparticles (that are constantly being sprayed into our atmosphere by the the geoengineers) which are able to be manipulated with the global grid of radio frequency transmitters. Some suggest that these radio frequencies have originated from ionospheric heaters like HAARP (High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program) in Gakona, Alaska, the most notable U.S. geoengineering facility. HAARP wasscheduled for shut down by the U.S. Air Force in May, 2014. There are many other transmission installations around the world, some officially known and others completely secret. U.S. Senate Document Reveals Weather Modification
The United States Federal government has been involved for over 60 years in a number of aspects of weather modification, through activities of both the Congress and executive branch. Since 1947, weather modification bills pertained to research support, operations, policy studies, regulations, liabilities, activity reporting, establishment of panels and committees, and international concerns have been introduced in the Congress. There have been hearings on many of these proposed measures, and oversight hearings have also been conducted on pertinent ongoing programs. In the 750-page document below, various topics regarding weather modification are discussed, including but not limited to:
Weather Warfare Explained Further
References
Department of State - Office of the Historian. (1967). Foreign Relations of the United States, 1964–1968, Volume XXVIII, Laos - Office of the Historian. [online] Available at: https://history.state.gov/historicaldocuments/frus1964-68v28/d274#fnref:1.5.4.4.14.336.7.6 [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017].
Keller, D., Feng, E. and Oschlies, A. (2014). Potential climate engineering effectiveness and side effects during a high carbon dioxide-emission scenario. Nature Communications, 5. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms4304 Wigington, D. (2016). Is Climate Engineering Real? Square Cloud Formations Are Undeniable Proof. [online] Geoengineering Watch. Available at: http://www.geoengineeringwatch.org/is-climate-engineering-real-square-cloud-formations-are-undeniable-proof/ [Accessed 12 Sep. 2017]. 
|
This feed contains research, news, information, observations, and ideas at the level of the world.
Archives
December 2024
Categories
All
|
||||||||
RSS Feed
